Yes; Ert is tagged - not opm-parser, and that is probably OK
-----Original Message----- From: Bård Skaflestad [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 22. oktober 2013 12:15 To: Atgeirr Rasmussen Cc: Andreas Lauser; Roland Kaufmann; Arne Morten Kvarving; Joakim Hove; Kristian Flikka Subject: Re: Release 2013.10 -- tagging in one hour On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 11:52 +0200, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote: > Unless someone pulls the brakes, we will tag release/2013.10/rc2 at > about one o'clock (1300) [...] > Joakim: do you want to tag ert and opm-parser? I thought ERT was already tagged? At least I get the following list from 'git tag -l -n1' in the ERT repository: release/2013.03/final Tag release 2013/03 release/2013.10/final 2013 Opm release release/2013/03 Tag release 2013/03 > I do not think that opm-parser needs it, since it is not part of the > official release as such? That's my opinion too. > We may need a tag in ert to reflect the 'version that is needed by opm > release 2013.10'. I think we already have that. Bård ------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you _______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
