I realize now I sent my original reply only to Joakim, it said: ————————————
This is very welcome. I think we have agreed on accepting the extra dependency for now, and that is the only drawback. When you say *half-ways* merge I am a bit confused though, what do you mean? After this, new code should aggressively try to use the new parser instead of the old one. ———————————— Since Joakim answered my question: I think that keeping the branch alive for now is ok, but I do not see any reason for it to live very long after the merge. Atgeirr 5. feb. 2014 kl. 14:43 skrev Joakim Hove <[email protected]>: > When you say *half-ways* merge I am a bit confused though, what do you > mean? > > What I mean with *half-ways* is that the opm-parser-integrate branch will > continue to live, there is still work to be converted/integrated/... > > Joalkim > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is > intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the > information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the > addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete > this message. > Thank you > > _______________________________________________ > Opm mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm _______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
