Hi, On Friday 28 March 2014 12:29:17 Joakim Hove wrote: >> hm, okay. does Eclipse accept that particular deck? if yes, it may be a >> good idea to also become a bit less strict in opm-parser. (maybe we should >> just produce a warning instead of an error?) > > Forget it. Eclipse eats more or less anything; we need all the safety we > can get. This is the documented behavior. That's fun! It somehow reminds me on PL/I, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PL/I It's a programming language which also eats anything without complaints; even plain IFs. For some reason, I've got doubts about whether software is _that_ good at mind reading ;)
cheers
Andreas
--
Never underestimate a C programmer's ability to write C code in any
language you give them.
— Jason Gorman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
