Hello Paolo,

Yes, the black-oil simulator(s) in question is found in opm-autodiff as I wrote 
in the previous mail. More precisely, you will find the one with the 
unstructured grid interface in
sim_fibo_ad.cpp, while the one using cpgrid is found in sim_fibo_ad_cp.cpp. The 
first is what has been the main focus for the black-oil simulator, the second 
was made to enable parallel MPI simulations with Dune solvers. The two codes 
have been diverging lately (some code for transmissibility multipliers was 
implemented only for the unstructered grid), leading me to think that the 
current solution with helper classes is not ideal.

Cheers,
Alf

________________________________
From: Paolo Orsini [paolo.ors...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 5:01 PM
To: Alf Birger Rustad
Cc: opm@opm-project.org
Subject: Re: [OPM] Grid interface

Ok, doing some more browsing I found some reference to the black-oil model (BO) 
in the opm-autodiff, this has been updated more recently (... yesterday).. I 
suppose this is the one?
Just checking which BO I should look at... the one you intend to develop, for 
which some testing might be welcome

Thanks again

Paolo


On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Paolo Orsini 
<paolo.ors...@gmail.com<mailto:paolo.ors...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Alf,

Sorry for the stupid question, ... what's the OPM module where the black oil 
simulator is being developed?
browsing the git repositories I found a black oil model in eWomes, is it this 
one you are referring to?

Thanks

Paolo


On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Alf Birger Rustad 
<a...@statoil.com<mailto:a...@statoil.com>> wrote:
Hello everybody,

Finally we have a reference black-oil simulator coming into shape, but 
admittedly still some rough edges to iron out. During this effort we uncovered 
challenges with our plumbing. The most prominent is perhaps the two grid 
interfaces cpgrid and unstructered grid. The first is what we have interfaced 
to Dune with, the second is the one used for the black-oil simulator in 
opm-autodiff. I believe they both have technical merits, but accommodating to 
both has become a growing burden. Hence, I suggest we discuss possibilities for 
unifying the two interfaces into one. Pros and cons, technical merits of the 
two, suggested approaches for unifying, or arguments to keep both, are all 
welcome topics in the discussion.

What do you think?
Alf


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org<mailto:Opm@opm-project.org>
http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm




-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm

Reply via email to