I use a similar setup as Bård, and I am also reluctant to abandon the so-called sibling builds.
Having heard that various meta-project will solve the same, I am willing to try them out, what should I be using instead? My main concerns are that: - it must not be too hard to make a "developer's install" (although it can be harder than a "user's install") - that install must contain only a single working directory for any module (that then can be used to build all configs desired) - our current install docs (while outdated in the face of opm-cmake) assume a sibling build Also: what is the purpose of removing this? What are the user errors we are trying to prevent? How significant is the simplification of the build system that will result? I know we discussed this at the OPM meeting a few months ago, but I'd like to know the motivation behind this a little better. Thanks for making a discussion out of this rather than just doing it…! Atgeirr _______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
