Hi, We have done some more investigation in this specific issue and made a few bug fixing and improvements on the flow_polymer through PR https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators/pull/972 .
The results with benchmark testing cases show perfect matching even when PLMIXPAR != 1.0. Please rerun your test and let us know how flow_polymer is working with your examples now. Thanks. Best, Kai Bao ________________________________________ From: Opm [[email protected]] on behalf of Bao Kai [[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 1:43 PM To: Тимур Киреев Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Opm] Flow-polymer and Eclipse result mismatch Hi, Welcome to the OPM community first. It is a known problem and we have not solved it. We did some tests and investigation, while it looks like it is not that trivial and requires some detailed analysis. We have not found available time to investigate it further, and contributions will be very welcome. Best, Kai Bao On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Тимур Киреев <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear all, I have found that changing PLMIXPAR from 1.0 to 0.0 in dataset 'opm-data/polymer_test_suite/simple2D' leads to result mismatch between flow_polymer and Eclipse. When PLMIXPAR = 1.0 there is a perfect match. It seems like flow_polymer handles mix parameter improperly. Has anyone tried to vary this parameter and compare the results with Eclipse? Thank you. _______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm _______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
