Hi

I have tried converting the MULTZ keywords in my test ECLIPSE input file to 
PERMZ so that upscale can read the fine-scale grid.  Unfortunately, it does not 
seem possible to do this.  Consider a 1*1*N model with MULTZ(I) = 0.0.  In 
order to reproduce TRANZ(I) = 0 using PERMZ  only, then either PERMZ(I) = 0.0 
or PERMZ(I+1) = 0.0.  If the former, then TRANZ(I-1) = 0.0 also and if the 
latter then TRANZ(I+1) = 0.0.  If either TRANZ(I-1) > 0 or TRANZ(I+1) > 0 in 
reality (which they are in my case), then conversion is not possible.  Am I 
correct in assuming that upscale does not read MULTZ* keywords?

Best regards

Alun

-----Original Message-----
From: Alun Griffiths
Sent: 28 April 2022 14:29
To: [email protected]
Cc: Bård Skaflestad <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Error with upscale_relpermvisc

Hi Bard

Looking at the source code was really helpful - thanks!   The .grdecl file was 
missing SATNUM and PORO and once I added them, upscale_relpermvisc ran OK.  I 
now need to check how the fine grid model + rock curves compares to the coarse 
grid model + pseudos.  I have MULTZ keywords in the .grdecl file but I don't 
think upscale_relpermvisc will read these so will probably have to adjust the 
PERMZ array to incorporate them.  Will let you know how I get on

Best regards

Alun

-----Original Message-----
From: Bård Skaflestad <[email protected]>
Sent: 28 April 2022 13:28
To: Alun Griffiths <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
Subject: RE: Error with upscale_relpermvisc

Hi,

Thanks for bringing this issue to our attention.  The first problem is 
*probably* that the diagnostic message is incomplete.  For what it's worth, the 
upscale_relpermvisc utility looks for the following input data:

* SPECGRID
* COORD
* ZCORN
* PORO
* PERMX
* SATNUM

If you're comfortable looking at C++ source code, you can review the keyword 
existence check on lines 351--356 of upscale_relpermvisc.cpp (GitHub URL: 
https://github.com/OPM/opm-upscaling/blob/78bf78a8373f59d5d3d0394a0d8de12e822c9c5a/examples/upscale_relpermvisc.cpp#L351-L356)

At minimum the diagnostic message should mention PORO, PERMX, and SATNUM too, 
but ideally we should only identify the requisite input data that's actually 
missing.  Maybe your case is missing SATNUM?  In that case you can insert

SATNUM
N*1 /

with 'N' being the product of the grid dimensions instead.  That is still a 
little superfluous however, because the upscale_relpermvisc utility will use 
that definition as a fallback if it's not actually present in the input file.

Please let us know if you get any further if your input file provides porosity, 
permeability and saturation region information.


Best Regards,

Bård Skaflestad
OPM Developer
SINTEF Digital, Mathematics & Cybernetics Computational Geosciences group

-----Original Message-----
From: Opm <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Alun Griffiths
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 11:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Opm] Error with upscale_relpermvisc

Hi

I have created a .grdecl file which was successfully upscaled using 
upscale_perm.  However, when I use the same file in upscale_relpermvisc, I get 
the following error message:

Error: Did not find SPECGRID, COORD and ZCORN in ECLIPSE file facies_2a.grdecl

I checked the .grdecl file and it contains these keywords so not sure what the 
issue is.

Best regards

Alun Griffiths

[http://rockhopperexploration.co.uk/signatures/images/spacer.png]
[http://rockhopperexploration.co.uk/signatures/images/spacer.png]
[Rockhopper Exploration plc]<http://rockhopperexploration.co.uk>        
[http://rockhopperexploration.co.uk/signatures/images/spacer.png]

Rockhopper Exploration plc
Warner House
123 Castle Street
Salisbury
SP1 3TB

[http://rockhopperexploration.co.uk/signatures/images/spacer.png]

Tel: +44(0) 1722 414419
Fax: +44 (0) 203 325 1954

Website:
www.rockhopperexploration.co.uk<http://rockhopperexploration.co.uk>

[http://rockhopperexploration.co.uk/signatures/images/spacer.png]
[http://rockhopperexploration.co.uk/signatures/images/spacer.png]

Incorporated and Registered in England and Wales with registered no. 5250250

[http://rockhopperexploration.co.uk/signatures/images/spacer.png]

This electronic mail message, including any attachments is a confidential 
communication exclusively between Rockhopper Exploration plc and the intended 
recipient)s), indicated as the addressee(s). It contains information that is 
private and may be proprietary or covered by legal professional privilege. If 
you receive this message in any form and you are not the intended recipient you 
must not review, use, disclose or disseminate it. We would be grateful if you 
could contact the sender upon receipt and in any event you should destroy this 
message without delay. Anything contained in this message that is not connected 
with the business of Rockhopper Exploration plc is neither endorsed by nor is 
the liability of this company.
_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
[email protected]
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Reply via email to