Dear Henk,

Thanks for sharing your interest in OPM Flow. I believe you are not the only 
party that would be interested in dual porosity and/or dual permeability, but 
to the best of my knowledge there is no active development in that direction at 
the moment. Supporting such development can be for example implementing the 
feature, writing documentation, or financial contributions.

We could arrange an informal meeting to discuss possibilities.

Atgeirr

________________________________
From: Opm <[email protected]> on behalf of Henk van Oeveren 
<[email protected]>
Sent: 14 March 2023 07:16
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [Opm] DUALPERM

Dear,

I am using OPM flow for geothermal development. We are operating 10 geothermal 
wells, and are expanding.
For certain cases we would strongly benefit from a DUALPERM model.
We would like to investigate what happens if cold water seeps down through 
fissures, would it slow breakthrough?
We can plan wells accordingly.

How am I to recommend such an implementation to OPM? Can I support in any way?

Kind regards,

Henk van Oeveren
Sr. Project leader geothermal/Reservoir engineer
_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
[email protected]
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
  • [Opm] DUALPERM Henk van Oeveren
    • Re: [Opm] DUALPERM Atgeirr Flø Rasmussen

Reply via email to