Hi. I'll check it. my username is: FatemehA � > Hi, > > I’ve added a figure to chapter 2.4, 2.5.1 and 2.5.2. > Please check and comment: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/17919/ > > @Fathemeh: I could not find you in the gerrit users list, sorry for that. > > Br, > Gerg0 > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 8:37 AM > To: Georg Kunz ; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for > contribution. > > > Hi Georg, > > Sorry for answering too late; > > As you mentioned, I reviewed requirement’s document and I think the > following points should be considered: > > 1. In sections 2.1.1, 2.1.3.1 , 2.4, I think a picture could make > descriptions more clear. > > 2. In sections 2.5.1 and 2.5.2, I think two high level architeture > pictures could show how instances or clouds's networks would be > seprated.) > ( as a sample: > docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-ovs.html) > > > > I’m working on finding a good example for your suggested part (2.4.2), > > I think these scenarios are not bad : > http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-lb.html > , > http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-ovs.html > , but actually I’m not sure; > > So I’m digging into Neutron provider and tenant networks in openstack to > give you a good example. > > > > P.S. I have direct access to Gerrit and indirect access to opnfv > requirement’s doc (using VPN), but we want to have direct access because > the sanctions against Iran were lifted.:) > > > >> Hi Fathemeh, >> >> Great. Gergely (in CC) is the main author of those use cases, so you >> can >> contact him or we discuss this on the upcoming NetReady call. >> >> Regarding your access restrictions, what does this mean in practice? >> Can >> you access the OPNFV Gerrit? >> >> Best regards >> Georg >> >> > From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Fatemeh >> Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2016 1:24 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for >> contribution. >> >> Hi Georg, >> >> Your response to my question was encouraging. Thank you for spending >> time >> to point out all available options. I'd taken a look at the latest >> version >> of the requirements doc and backlogs in jira. I found these use cases >> interesting in requirements doc : "2.4.2. Connection between different >> OpenStack regions or cloud instances" , "2.3. Programmable Provisioning >> of >> Provider networks" >> I think the first one would be my better choice for start point! >> >> I hope, our combined efforts will give us a good coordination and great >> result. >> >> P.S: I'm from Iran. Although the sanctions against Iran were lifted, We >> don't have any direct access to the latest version of requirements doc. >> >> Kindest regards, >> Fatemeh Abdollahei >> On ۱۶/۰۶/۳۰ 12:32, Georg Kunz wrote: >> Hi Fatemeh, >> >> sorry for the late reply. Well, yes, we have a few items in our backlog >> in >> Jira that nobody has picked up yet. Currently, we are working towards a >> first version of our requirements document. The goal is to get a stable >> version with a small selection of use cases which we can then discuss >> with >> the OpenStack Neutron developers. >> >> I basically see three ways of contributing to the project: >> >> i) support the ongoing effort of stabilizing the current version of the >> requirements doc. You can have a look at the latest version here [1]. >> If >> you find one of the use cases interesting, just let us know and we can >> coordinate further. >> >> ii) you have a networking use case on your mind which is challenging to >> realize based on the currently available features in OpenStack or which >> is >> basically missing at all. If so, feel free to bring it up here or in >> our >> weekly meeting and we can discuss it. >> >> iii) have a look at our backlog in Jira. If you find a particular use >> case interesting, let's discuss it and see if you want to add it to the >> requirements doc. Please note, however, that the Jira backlog is >> currently >> not well managed I have to admit. (Note to myself: clean up Jira!) >> >> I hope, this overview helps you a bit. You are very welcome to join the >> project and join the weekly meetings. >> >> [1] http://artifacts.opnfv.org/netready/docs/requirements/index.html >> >> Best regards >> Georg >> >> >> > From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> [email protected] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 11:06 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for contribution. >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> I've just taken a look at NetReady project and now I have a question >> about >> it. As there are many issues in "To DO" state, I was wondering where >> the >> appropriate start point would be. >> How can I contribute in NetReady project? What is your suggestion for >> the >> start point? >> >> >> Thanks in advance and looking forward to hearing from you, >> >> >> Fatemeh Abdollahei >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
