Hi Ray, thanks for posting the initial cut. IMHO a "composite score", as proposed on the page, could be *very* misleading, especially for projects which do most of the work upstream. So unless we track all upstream repos and upstream Jiras (or similar), I would suggest to *not* compute a composite score but evaluate things qualitatively only.
Thanks, Frank From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik Sent: Montag, 29. August 2016 19:33 To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Following up on Project Health metrics discussion All, I had an action item from last week to start a wiki page for the "project health metrics". You can find a proposal page at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Project+Health+Metrics. Please add your comments/feedback via email or directly on the wiki page. I listed four activity areas that was discussed on the TSC call, but feel free to add other activities that the community should consider. Thanks, Ray
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
