Attendees: Anthony Soong, Chris Price, Larry Lamers, Margaret Chiosi,
Pierre Lynch, Steven Wright, Tapio Tallgren, Toby Ford, Uli Kleber, Yunjun
Zhang, Min Yu

   -

   Meeting Minutes/Agenda: approved


   -

      There was a suggestion to meet weekly beyond September. A concern was
      raised that a weekly Thursday meeting at 6AM PT will conflict with the
      technical-discuss calls that have been dormant but will become
active soon.

      -

   Review OpenStack Roadmap
   -

      Margaret noted that she likes the visuals in OpenStack Roadmap
      
<https://www.openstack.org/assets/software/mitaka/Community-Generated-OpenStack-Roadmap-Mitaka-042016.pdf>
      from the theme view to release view and down to the project view. In
      particular, the theme-view visual illustrates well what activities are
      happening where. Margaret is hoping that the Aha! tool can facilitate a
      similar visual output for the OPNFV roadmap.
      -

      The group had a discussion if the OpenStack roadmap themes,
      scalability, resiliency, manageability, modularity, and interoperability
      differ from how the same words are understood in the OPNFV community.
      Attendees noted a couple of differences.
      -

         Interoperability in OPNFV refers to the ability to interoperate
         between different functional blocks versus open cloud stacks
in OpenStack.
         -

         Carrier grade in OPNFV is similar to but encompasses more than
         resiliency.
         -

      A discussion followed to further define the initiatives under the
      OPNFV’s goals of reference platform and methodology. A question
was raised
      if several items, such as testing, that are categorized under methodology
      should be grouped under both platform and methodology. A suggestion was
      made to change “initiatives” to “characteristics and methods” to more
      accurately communicate the grouping of these items. Attendees noted both
      the value of continuing the architectural discussion of
characterization of
      themes and the immediate need to focus on defining user stories
in order to
      provide guidance to the technical community.
      -

   User Scenarios of Pain Points and Priorities
   -

      Steven reported that EUAG didn’t discuss the pain points extensively
      at its last call on August 31. They’re aiming to have more refined and
      coherent pain points by the ODL Summit.
      -

      There was a suggestion to jumpstart the process by having a few
      interested members within EUAG create the user stories for VNF
onboarding.
      Uli shared Huawei’s projects related to VNF onboarding and noted they are
      in very early stages. Steven added a few high-level details to consider
      such as inquiring about the existence of VNFs to onboard, how to handle
      proprietary VNFs and measure success from a procedural point of view.
      There was a comment about the need to get down to the next level of
      details. Steven asked Polestar to be sensitive to the time it
may take for
      EUAG to accomplish that.
      -

      Margaret will talk to Ray about scheduling a time and place at the
      ODL Summit for the Polestar WG and the EUAG members to meet F2F to flesh
      out the details and user stories of VNF onboarding.



--
Min Yu
Client Services Coordinator
The Linux Foundation
+1(530) 902-6464 (m)
m...@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: minyudecorah
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to