Hi Michal,I made the changes only for LF pod 1, tenant nic.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S®6 active, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone<div> </div><div> </div><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Michal Skalski <mskal...@mirantis.com> </div><div>Date: 9/16/16 8:30 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: Tim Rozet <tro...@redhat.com> </div><div>Cc: "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <fbroc...@cisco.com>, infra-steer...@lists.opnfv.org, Gregory Elkinbard <gelkinb...@mirantis.com>, "Sean Chandler (sechandl)" <secha...@cisco.com>, fds-...@lists.opnfv.org, OPNFV Tech <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Configuring LF POD with 2 RQs on VIC profiles </div><div> </div>Hi Tim, Sorry I missed this discussion, is there any updates related to applying this configuration on LF pod? On LF POD2 we currently observe problems with dpdk, and I thought that it could be related. Thanks, Michal > On 29 Aug 2016, at 20:00, Frank Brockners (fbrockne) <fbroc...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > +1 on the config change. > > Background: If one wants to switch to Rx scatter mode for 1 queue or use more > than 1 RQ, one really does have to configure on the VNIC 2x the number needed > by the DPDK app. There is no way around this in the current implementation > and is the way Rx scatter works on the VIC, where Rx Scatter spill-over > buffers are on a 2nd RQ . Hence the general advice is to configure 2x the > number of RQs needed. This will also be reflected in the next revision of the > ENIC driver documentation. Longer term, there is a plan to eliminate the 2nd > RQ in general (not just for 1 RQ) when Rx scatter is disabled but this is > probably happening post the 16.11 DPDK release. > > Frank > > > -----Original Message----- > From: fds-dev-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > [mailto:fds-dev-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tim Rozet > Sent: Montag, 29. August 2016 18:17 > To: infra-steer...@lists.opnfv.org > Cc: Gregory Elkinbard <gelkinb...@mirantis.com>; Sean Chandler (sechandl) > <secha...@cisco.com>; fds-...@lists.opnfv.org; OPNFV Tech > <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> > Subject: [Fds-dev] Configuring LF POD with 2 RQs on VIC profiles > > Hi, > We need to configure 2 RQs on VIC profiles in the UCS manager for DPDK to > work. From what I understand we can make the configuration change and it > won't take effect until the blades are rebooted. For Apex, we need POD 1 to > have this configuration for FDIO/and OVS DPDK to daily jobs to pass. Before > I make the change, just want to make sure no one is against it. Also, do you > want me to make the same configuration change for LF POD2 for Fuel? > > Thanks, > > Tim Rozet > Red Hat SDN Team > > _______________________________________________ > fds-dev mailing list > fds-...@lists.opnfv.org > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/fds-dev > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
