I’ll see what I can dust off in prep for next call. I will be Shanghai next
week, but should be able to make it— just an issue of cost in case VOIP fails.
> On Sep 22, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Christopher Price <chrispric...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please refrain from keeping your mouth shut.
> It is a good topic to bring back to life, we have discussed the lifecycle
> process on TSC calls over the last weeks (when not addressing Colorado) and
> have an intention to look further into improvements and development during
> the Danube release. Now is the right time to raise topics and it may even be
> worth spinning out an action point or two to find focus areas and activities
> to work on. (Let’s see if we have time on Tuesday to add it to the agenda)
> Two top of mind topics in this area:
> · We have an open item to discuss branching and developer support on
> the tech discuss calls.
> · We have an activity to provide useful project metrics for the
> community from our dashboards.
> · An ongoing thread and committed activities to help track upstream,
> / Chris
> From: <opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Ash
> <a...@wildernessvoice.com <mailto:a...@wildernessvoice.com>>
> Date: Thursday 22 September 2016 at 22:19
> To: Daniel Smith <daniel.sm...@ericsson.com
> Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Follow up on Upstreaming Questions
> Once upon a time, we had a process Lifecycle process for taking care of this,
> but ya'll TSC folks vetoed me. And instead, we put something in place that
> proved to be simpler, but not as useful as we had apparently hoped.
> I could always dust off that prior work, if there's any interest. We had
> collaborative input on it.
> Sorry for jumping in on your TSC thread. I'll go back to keeping my mouth
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Daniel Smith <daniel.sm...@ericsson.com
> <mailto:daniel.sm...@ericsson.com>> wrote:
>> Hello TSC Membrs
>> Several weeks ago as part of the inclusion of Requirements Projects, I
>> asked how we know that people are looking at what we are producing in
>> Requirements projects and how we (OPNFV) ensure that deliverables from
>> Requirements projects are being reviewed and taken into account upstream
>> (from an OPNFV overall standpoint).
>> Would any of you be able to shed some light on this? The current impression
>> that I have is we have the docs that sit in a repo and that’s it.
>> Thank you
>> <image001.png> <http://www.ericsson.com/>
>> Daniel Smith
>> Sr. System Designer
>> Ericsson Inc.
>> 8400 Decarie Blvd. Montreal, PQ
>> (514)-594-2799 <tel:%28514%29-594-2799>
>> <image002.png> <http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign>
>> Legal entity: Ericsson AB, registered office in Stockholm. This
>> Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis
>> of the terms set out at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer
>> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing
> list firstname.lastname@example.org
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list