Well, As I got no objections today's meeting will be informal. I'll wait for another opinions till next Tuesday, and if don't get them will assume that everyone agree with such solution. Thanks for voting!
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:03 PM Peter Barabas <peter.bara...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > > +1 for casual meeting. > > > > Regards, > > PEter. > ------------------------------ > *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org < > opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> on behalf of Alexandru > Avadanii <alexandru.avada...@enea.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 11, 2016 11:49:33 AM > *To:* Michal Skalski; Fedor Zhadaev > > *Cc:* MichalSkalski <mskal...@mirantis.com>, yunhong.ji...@linux.intel.com > <yunhong.ji...@linux.intel.com>, opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tuesday's casual meeting > Hi, > +1 for casual meeting > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech- > > discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Michal Skalski > > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 12:39 PM > > To: Fedor Zhadaev > > Cc: MichalSkalski <mskal...@mirantis.com>, yunhong.ji...@linux.intel.com > > <yunhong.ji...@linux.intel.com>, opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > > Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tuesday's casual meeting > > > > Hi, > > > > I vote for casual meeting. > > > > Michal > > > On 11 Oct 2016, at 11:17, Stefan Berg K <stefan.k.b...@ericsson.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'd vote for a best-effort IRC meeting. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Stefan > > > > > > Från: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org <opnfv-tech-discuss- > > boun...@lists.opnfv.org> för Fedor Zhadaev <fzhad...@mirantis.com> > > > Skickat: den 11 oktober 2016 10:53 > > > Till: MichalSkalski <mskal...@mirantis.com>, > > yunhong.ji...@linux.intel.com <yunhong.ji...@linux.intel.com>, opnfv- > > tech-disc...@lists.opnfv.org > > > Ämne: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tuesday's casual meeting > > > > > > Hello Fuel team. > > > I have question about our Tuesday's meeting. What is your vision of it? > > Should it be formal meeting (i.e. sync-up) or just time-slot when most of > > active people will be available in IRC and ready for discussion? > > > In the first case I'll need to propose to move it for an hour earlier > (before > > TSC meeting) or 1.5 hours later (after Release meeting) to be able to > drive it. > > > It the second case I'll be partially available on this meeting due to > my > > attending of TSC meeting. > > > Please share your opinion here. By default I'll propose the second > solution > > for today. > > > -- > > > Kind Regards, > > > Fedor Zhadaev > > > > > > email: fzhad...@mirantis.com > > > skype: zhadaevfm > > > IRC: fzhadaev > > > _______________________________________________ > > > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > > > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > > > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > -- Kind Regards, Fedor Zhadaev email: fzhad...@mirantis.com skype: zhadaevfm IRC: fzhadaev
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss