Hi Ray,

 

While I see that Ocata is a shorter release cycle the Pike release is within a 
couple of weeks of the same date as Newton.  My guess would be that if we delay 
Danube to skip newton we would have 2 OPNFV releases with an Ocata based VIM.  
Danube set’s challenges across a variety of project delivery dates where we may 
not be able to “squeeze in the difference” to accommodate for coordination.

 

I’m not sure that there is a lot of benefit in OPNFV making significant changes 
to our cadence based on that.  Maybe once we have our CI evolution process in 
place we can establish some form of predictable metric (and improvements) 
around the time it takes to stabilize once our upstream communities release.  
(not all upstream are equal in that aspect.)

 

Maybe the right answer is to try and pull back our own cycles based on 
improvements in our own integration activities.  It could also be that we use 
our “cadence” as a guideline and look to release in a +/- one month window 
based on multi-project cross community planning.

 

/ Chris

 

From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Raymond Paik 
<[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2016 at 06:38
To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <[email protected]>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Which OpenStack release for Danube?

 

Another follow-up from the TSC call.

 

OpenStack-Ocata is scheduled to release in late February (see 
http://www.openstack.org/ptg#tab_about) and a question was raised during 
OpenStack Summit last week if we should consider delaying the Danube release so 
that Ocata (vs. Newton) will be part of Danube.

 

Some people were supportive of including the latest release of OpenStack, but 
there were also concerns about "skipping" the Newton release.  Let's continue 
the conversation on this thread...

 

Thanks, 

 

Ray

_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list 
[email protected] 
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss 

_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to