On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Yujun Zhang <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I think there would be a different expectation for "mature" projects.
>
> It is quite difficult to define "fully functional" and "stable" since the
> projects never stop evolution even after mature.
>
> From a developer's view, a mature project can be judged from
>
>    1. regular release cycle
>    2. test coverage
>    3. documentation completeness
>    4. security integrity
>    5. timely response on feedback
>    6. fluent process on evolution
>
> My two cents.
>
>
+1

security integrity could entail a project being audited (which most already
are) and being vulnerability managed:

https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=2926046


On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:25 PM Raymond Paik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> One of my action items from the TSC meeting....  We discussed graduation
>> reviews for "mature" projects in OPNFV.  On the Project Lifecycle document (
>> https://www.opnfv.org/developers/technical-project-
>> governance/project-lifecycle), a mature project is defined as "Project
>> is fully functioning and stable, has achieved successful releases."
>>
>> One of the questions that was raised on the call was, after graduation
>> how would "mature" projects be different from projects in the "incubation"
>> stage.  Is this just a badge/label or are there different expectations?
>>
>> Please discuss :-)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ray
>> _______________________________________________
>> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>
>


-- 
Luke Hinds | NFV Partner Engineering | Office of Technology | Red Hat
e: [email protected] | irc: lhinds @freenode | m: +44 77 45 63 98 84 | t: +44
12 52 36 2483
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to