On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 at 7:51 AM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,


> Then I will update these things in the document.

I would like to suggest that  we will consider this as requirement lock and
> proceed further with the implementation of single resource-sync.

once this thing is implemented/commited in gerrit.


> Further improvements like syncing all resources or a bunch of resources
> will come in later part.


> Thanks

Goutham


> Hello, Goutham,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> For os-sync API, two suggestions:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 1. we need to use POST but not put for this action
>
>
> 2. Even for single resource sync, "ID" should be part of the request body,
> but not as part of the URL path.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [
> opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] on behalf of joehuang [
> joehu...@huawei.com]
>
>
> *Sent:* 07 December 2016 16:32
>
>
> *To:* Goutham Pratapa
>
>
> *Cc:* Ashish singh; caizhiyuan (A); opnfv-tech-discuss
>
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello, two comments in the doc. Need to discuss this in the weekly meeting.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> *From:* Goutham Pratapa [goutham.prat...@tcs.com]
>
>
> *Sent:* 07 December 2016 14:15
>
>
> *To:* joehuang
>
>
> *Cc:* Ashish Singh7; Dimitri Mazmanov; Ashish singh; caizhiyuan (A);
> Meimei; opnfv-tech-discuss; Sama, Malla Reddy; Zhipeng Huang;
> pratapagout...@gmail.com
>
>
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Made some comments regarding Syncing of multiple keypairs at a time
>
>
>
>
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N6HFAFUT5BbEp1wbnYjgaKdOlyJanwkXccv-_1zsVQc/edit?disco=AAAAA4VEf0U
>
>
>
>
>
> as off now we have implemented keypair-sync for a *specified keypair* or
> sync
>
> *all* keypairs
>
>
>
>
>
> Ashish and I thought this option will also help.
>
>
>
>
>
> Please find the link and provide your feedback on this.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Goutham
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: -----
>
>
>
> To: Goutham Pratapa <goutham.prat...@tcs.com>
>
>
> From: joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com>
>
>
> Date: 11/30/2016 06:57PM
>
>
> Cc: Ashish Singh7 <ashish.sin...@tcs.com>, Dimitri Mazmanov <
> dimitri.mazma...@ericsson.com>, Ashish singh <ashishsingh...@gmail.com>,
> "caizhiyuan (A)" <caizhiyu...@huawei.com>, Meimei <mei...@huawei.com>,
> opnfv-tech-discuss <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>,
>
> "Sama, Malla Reddy" <s...@docomolab-euro.com>, Zhipeng Huang <
> zhipengh...@gmail.com>, "pratapagout...@gmail.com" <
> pratapagout...@gmail.com>
>
>
> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
> hello, Goutham,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> When I tried to review your update, and click "see new changes", it said
> you have removed the update, I did not find the update yet.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> *From:* Goutham Pratapa [goutham.prat...@tcs.com]
>
>
> *Sent:* 29 November 2016 17:09
>
>
> *To:* joehuang
>
>
> *Cc:* Ashish Singh7; Dimitri Mazmanov; Ashish singh; caizhiyuan (A);
> Meimei; opnfv-tech-discuss; Sama, Malla Reddy; Zhipeng Huang;
> pratapagout...@gmail.com
>
>
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
>
>
> I have made some comments regarding the keypair syncing.
>
>
>
>
>
> which allows user to sync only specified keypair and option for syncing
> all keypairs.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Goutham
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: -----
>
>
>
> To: Ashish Singh7 <ashish.sin...@tcs.com>
>
>
> From: joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com>
>
>
> Date: 11/01/2016 01:59PM
>
>
> Cc: Dimitri Mazmanov <dimitri.mazma...@ericsson.com>, Ashish singh <
> ashishsingh...@gmail.com>, "caizhiyuan (A)" <caizhiyu...@huawei.com>,
> Meimei <mei...@huawei.com>, opnfv-tech-discuss <
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>, "Sama, Malla Reddy" <
> s...@docomolab-euro.com>,
>
> Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com>, Goutham Pratapa <
> goutham.prat...@tcs.com>, "pratapagout...@gmail.com" <
> pratapagout...@gmail.com>
>
>
> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
> Just one more comment for this action:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "All the resources(based on resource-type) from region 1 will be copied to
> region 2 and 3 leaving the overlapped
>
> ones where resource name being the identifier. "
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I think we can add one option to allow the force replacement for the
> overlapping items. If the user select force replacement, then
>
> the overlapping item should be fully replaced with the items from the
> source region
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> *From:* Ashish Singh7 [ashish.sin...@tcs.com]
>
>
> *Sent:* 01 November 2016 14:52
>
>
> *To:* joehuang
>
>
> *Cc:* Dimitri Mazmanov; Ashish singh; caizhiyuan (A); Meimei;
> opnfv-tech-discuss; Sama, Malla Reddy; Zhipeng Huang; Goutham Pratapa;
> pratapagout...@gmail.com
>
>
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Joe,
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for the comments, have incorporated those.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Ashish Singh
>
>
> Tata Consultancy Services
>
>
> Cell:- 9030419618
>
>
> Mailto: ashish.sin...@tcs.com
>
>
> Website: http://www.tcs.com
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
>
> Experience certainty. IT Services
>
>
> Business Solutions
>
>
> Consulting
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: -----
>
>
>
> To: Ashish Singh7 <ashish.sin...@tcs.com>
>
>
> From: joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com>
>
>
> Date: 11/01/2016 08:03AM
>
>
> Cc: Dimitri Mazmanov <dimitri.mazma...@ericsson.com>, Ashish singh <
> ashishsingh...@gmail.com>, "caizhiyuan (A)" <caizhiyu...@huawei.com>,
> Meimei <mei...@huawei.com>, opnfv-tech-discuss <
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>, "Sama, Malla Reddy" <
> s...@docomolab-euro.com>,
>
> Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com>, Goutham Pratapa <
> goutham.prat...@tcs.com>, "pratapagout...@gmail.com" <
> pratapagout...@gmail.com>
>
>
> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ashish,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Some minor comment has been added in the doc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> *From:* Ashish Singh7 [ashish.sin...@tcs.com]
>
>
> *Sent:* 27 October 2016 16:59
>
>
> *To:* joehuang
>
>
> *Cc:* Dimitri Mazmanov; Ashish singh; caizhiyuan (A); Meimei;
> opnfv-tech-discuss; Sama, Malla Reddy; Zhipeng Huang; Goutham Pratapa;
> pratapagout...@gmail.com
>
>
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>
>
> Have replied to the comment and added API structure as well.
>
>
> Have a look and comment accordingly.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Ashish Singh
>
>
> Tata Consultancy Services
>
>
> Cell:- 9030419618
>
>
> Mailto: ashish.sin...@tcs.com
>
>
> Website: http://www.tcs.com
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
>
> Experience certainty. IT Services
>
>
> Business Solutions
>
>
> Consulting
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: -----
>
>
>
>
>
> To: Ashish Singh7 <ashish.sin...@tcs.com>
>
>
> From: joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com>
>
>
> Date: 10/27/2016 01:35AM
>
>
> Cc: Dimitri Mazmanov <dimitri.mazma...@ericsson.com>, Ashish singh <
> ashishsingh...@gmail.com>, "caizhiyuan (A)" <caizhiyu...@huawei.com>,
> Meimei <mei...@huawei.com>, opnfv-tech-discuss <
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>, "Sama, Malla Reddy" <
> s...@docomolab-euro.com>,
>
> Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com>, Goutham Pratapa <
> goutham.prat...@tcs.com>, "pratapagout...@gmail.com" <
> pratapagout...@gmail.com>
>
>
> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello, Ashish,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Good update, just one comment in the doc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> *From:* Ashish Singh7 [ashish.sin...@tcs.com]
>
>
> *Sent:* 26 October 2016 18:40
>
>
> *To:* joehuang
>
>
> *Cc:* Dimitri Mazmanov; Ashish singh; caizhiyuan (A); Meimei;
> opnfv-tech-discuss; Sama, Malla Reddy; Zhipeng Huang; Goutham Pratapa;
> pratapagout...@gmail.com
>
>
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>
>
> Have added ssh-keys in place of secgroup in the document as per our latest
> discussion.
>
>
> Please have a look and comment accordingly.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Ashish Singh
>
>
> Tata Consultancy Services
>
>
> Cell:- 9030419618
>
>
> Mailto: ashish.sin...@tcs.com
>
>
> Website: http://www.tcs.com
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
>
> Experience certainty. IT Services
>
>
> Business Solutions
>
>
> Consulting
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: -----
>
>
>
> To: Dimitri Mazmanov <dimitri.mazma...@ericsson.com>, Ashish Singh <
> ashish.sin...@tcs.com>
>
>
> From: joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com>
>
>
> Date: 10/11/2016 08:11AM
>
>
> Cc: Ashish singh <ashishsingh...@gmail.com>, "caizhiyuan (A)" <
> caizhiyu...@huawei.com>, Meimei <mei...@huawei.com>, opnfv-tech-discuss <
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>, "Sama, Malla Reddy" <
> s...@docomolab-euro.com>, Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com>
>
>
> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> the following comment is also added in the doc:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> My opinion is to exclude SEG from the sync in Kingbird, because SEG sync
> action will lead to data plane in unpredictable situation
>
> during multi-region concurrent CRUD operation, this is some action will
> greatly impact the tenant's data plane service immediately, especially SEG
> is for security purpose.
>
>
>
>
>
> For KeyPair, because it's user based granularity resource, that means will
> be manipulated by single user, so the con-currency is not an
>
> issue. But we have to allow the user being able to start the sync, but not
> only Admin role
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> *From:* Dimitri Mazmanov [dimitri.mazma...@ericsson.com]
>
>
> *Sent:* 10 October 2016 18:24
>
>
> *To:* joehuang; Ashish Singh
>
>
> *Cc:* Ashish singh; caizhiyuan (A); Meimei; opnfv-tech-discuss; Sama,
> Malla Reddy; Zhipeng Huang
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Please see my comments as well
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com>
>
>
> *Date: *Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 03:24
>
>
> *To: *Ashish Singh <ashish.sin...@tcs.com>
>
>
> *Cc: *Ashish singh <ashishsingh...@gmail.com>, "caizhiyuan (A)" <
> caizhiyu...@huawei.com>, Dimitri Mazmanov <dimitri.mazma...@ericsson.com>,
> Meimei <mei...@huawei.com>, opnfv-tech-discuss <
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>, "Sama, Malla Reddy" <
> s...@docomolab-euro.com>,
>
> Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com>
>
>
> *Subject: *RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello, Ashish,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> More comments in the doc. Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
>
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ashish Singh7 [ashish.sin...@tcs.com]
>
>
> *Sent:* 04 October 2016 14:51
>
>
> *To:* joehuang
>
>
> *Cc:* Ashish singh; caizhiyuan (A); Dimitri Mazmanov; Meimei;
> opnfv-tech-discuss; Sama, Malla Reddy; Zhipeng Huang
>
>
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Joe,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have replied, Please check.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Ashish Singh
>
>
> Tata Consultancy Services
>
>
> Cell:- 9030419618
>
>
> Mailto: ashish.sin...@tcs.com
>
>
> Website: http://www.tcs.com
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
>
> Experience certainty. IT Services
>
>
> Business Solutions
>
>
> Consulting
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: -----
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To: Ashish Singh7 <ashish.sin...@tcs.com>
>
>
> From: joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com>
>
>
> Date: 10/04/2016 12:19PM
>
>
> Cc: Ashish singh <ashishsingh...@gmail.com>, "caizhiyuan (A)" <
> caizhiyu...@huawei.com>, Dimitri Mazmanov <dimitri.mazma...@ericsson.com>,
> Meimei <mei...@huawei.com>, opnfv-tech-discuss <
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>, "Sama, Malla Reddy" <
> s...@docomolab-euro.com>,
>
> Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com>
>
>
> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
> Thank you Ashish, comments are put in the document.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
>
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ashish Singh7 [ashish.sin...@tcs.com]
>
>
> *Sent:* 29 September 2016 22:04
>
>
> *To:* joehuang
>
>
> *Cc:* Ashish singh; caizhiyuan (A); Dimitri Mazmanov; Meimei;
> opnfv-tech-discuss; Sama, Malla Reddy; Zhipeng Huang
>
>
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have updated the document with an approach to solve concurrency problem.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please have a look and comment accordingly.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Ashish Singh
>
>
> Tata Consultancy Services
>
>
> Cell:- 9030419618
>
>
> Mailto: ashish.sin...@tcs.com
>
>
> Website: http://www.tcs.com
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
>
> Experience certainty. IT Services
>
>
> Business Solutions
>
>
> Consulting
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: -----
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To: Ashish Singh7 <ashish.sin...@tcs.com>
>
>
> From: joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com>
>
>
> Date: 09/27/2016 09:10AM
>
>
> Cc: Ashish singh <ashishsingh...@gmail.com>, "caizhiyuan (A)" <
> caizhiyu...@huawei.com>, Dimitri Mazmanov <dimitri.mazma...@ericsson.com>,
> Meimei <mei...@huawei.com>, opnfv-tech-discuss <
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>, "Sama, Malla Reddy" <
> s...@docomolab-euro.com>,
>
> Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com>
>
>
> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
> Hello, Ashish,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you for the BP and doc, see comments in the doc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
>
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ashish Singh7 [ashish.sin...@tcs.com]
>
>
> *Sent:* 26 September 2016 18:28
>
>
> *To:* joehuang
>
>
> *Cc:* Ashish singh; caizhiyuan (A); Dimitri Mazmanov; Meimei;
> opnfv-tech-discuss; Sama, Malla Reddy; Zhipeng Huang
>
>
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have registered a blueprint on "Resouce Syncing" and tied with a
> supporting document.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Blueprint:
>
>
>
>
> *https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kingbird/+spec/resource-syncing*
> <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kingbird/+spec/resource-syncing>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Google Docs link
>
>
>
>
>
> *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N6HFAFUT5BbEp1wbnYjgaKdOlyJanwkXccv-_1zsVQc/edit?usp=sharing*
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N6HFAFUT5BbEp1wbnYjgaKdOlyJanwkXccv-_1zsVQc/edit?usp=sharing>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Let us use this to discuss the feature and finalize it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Ashish Singh
>
>
> Tata Consultancy Services
>
>
> Cell:- 9030419618
>
>
> Mailto: ashish.sin...@tcs.com
>
>
> Website: http://www.tcs.com
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
>
> Experience certainty.        IT Services
>
>
>                        Business Solutions
>
>
>                        Consulting
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:        joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com>
>
>
>
>
> To:        Ashish singh <ashishsingh...@gmail.com>, opnfv-tech-discuss <
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>,
>
> "caizhiyuan (A)" <caizhiyu...@huawei.com>, Meimei <mei...@huawei.com>,
> "Sama, Malla Reddy" <s...@docomolab-euro.com>, Zhipeng Huang <
> zhipengh...@gmail.com>, "Dimitri Mazmanov" <dimitri.mazma...@ericsson.com>,
> Ashish Singh7 <ashish.sin...@tcs.com>
>
>
>
>
> Date:        09/21/2016 02:23 PM
>
>
>
>
> Subject:        RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing
> Approach
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello team,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Last year, use case 4 was discussed, some network related requirements
> were identified:
>
> https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/multisite_centralized_servic
> <https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/multisite_centralized_service>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    - global view for tenant level IP address / mac address space
>    management
>
>
>
>
>    If a tenant has networks in multiple region, and these networks are
>    routable (for example, connected with VPN), then, IP address may be
>    duplicated. Need a global view for IP address space management
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       - If IP v4 used, this issue needs to be considered. For IPv6, it
>       should not be a problem. IR - disagree with this statement. This
>       requirement is important not just for prevention of duplicate
>
>       address.
>
>
>       For security and other reasons it's important to know which IP
>       Addresses (IPv4 and IPv6) are used in which region.
>
>
>
>
>       Can we also extend such requirement to MAC address tracking?
>
>
>
>
>       Can we also extend such requirement to mapping for floating and
>       public IP Addresses
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    - A service to clone security groups across regions
>
>
>
>
>    No appropriate service to security groups across multiple region if
>    the tenant has resources distributed, has to set the security groups in
>    different region manually.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> And during the discussion thread with netready, one more issue identified
>
> http://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2016-July/011499.html:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    -  VxLAN pool cross site management for VxLAN segmentation allocation
>
>
>
> All these issues needs to be addressed, we can discuss them together.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Tricircle( now Tricircle team is working on the cleaning to make Tricircle
> dedicated for networking automation across Neutron, mentioned below) could
> be the reference, the design blueprint has just been updated
>
> for your reference:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zcxwl8xMEpxVCqLTce2-dUOtB-ObmzJTbV1uSQ6qTsY/
> ,
>
> local network and shared VLAN network and L3 has been implemented in
> Newton release. Of course, in NFV area, L2 networking should be enough in
> most scenario.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> And the spec for Tricircle Local Neutron Plugin is in review:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368529/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
>
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* joehuang
>
>
> *Sent:* 09 September 2016 16:59
>
>
> *To:* Ashish singh; opnfv-tech-discuss; caizhiyuan (A); Meimei; Sama,
> Malla Reddy; Zhipeng Huang; Dimitri Mazmanov; Ashish Singh7
>
>
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,  Ashish,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I think sync itself (if excluding the remote sec-group) is not complex,
> the complexity is to ensure the rules set in different region of Neutron
> will not conflict with each other. Otherwise,
>
> it'll become mess.
>
>
>
>
>
> So I agree with you "We must use neutron to perform all our operations as
> with neutron we have total control
>
> over it." (Is my understanding correct?)
>
>
>
>
>
> That's the way of Tricircle(please forgive me to explain a little:
> Tricircle now is only a project about networking automation across Neutron.
> And the Nova/Cinder API-Gateway
>
> part will be moved to Trio2o, a new created project:
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1kpVo5rsL6p_rq9TvkuczjommJSsisDiKJiurbhaQg7E/edit
> ),And
>
> the SEG sync has been implemented in the Tricircle, and we are now doing
> the tricircle splitting and cleaning.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If we implement seg sync in Kingbird, we have to write lots of duplicated
> code which has already done in Neutron, for example, SEG CRUD, rule CRUD,
> validation, rule checking, default rule
>
> management, etc.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
>
> Chaoyi Huang(joehuang)
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ashish singh [ashishsingh...@gmail.com]
>
>
> *Sent:* 08 September 2016 23:57
>
>
> *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss; caizhiyuan (A); Meimei; Sama, Malla Reddy;
> Zhipeng Huang; Ashish singh; Dimitri Mazmanov; joehuang; Ashish Singh7
>
>
> *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss][multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have drafted a basic approach for security group synching in release D
> and it is as follows.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Get list of secgroups  with rules for a tenant from all the regions
> which do not have remote group references(currently, we ignore remote
> secgroup references as there can be lot nested dependencies).
>
>
>
>
> - Traverse each region and do the following
>
>
>        - Get the list of secgroup which are present in all the regions
> except the current region, These are the secgroups which we need to sync in
> current region: say it GRP_TO_BE_SYNCED
>
>
>
>
>        - There can be case where the secgroup from GRP_TO_BE_SYNCED may
> have the same rules as the secgroup in current region(If not initially but
> which will obviously happen after a sync job).
>
>
>
>
>        - Traverse through the GRP_TO_BE_SYNCED and check if there are such
> secgroups(rules overlapping groups), if there, ignore it. After this
> filtering, the remaining secgroup will be the final list of secgroup which
> should be created for the current region.
>
>
>
>
>        - Create the secgroup with the final list of secgroups in the
> region.
>
>
>
>
> - Repeat the process for all the tenant in batches.
>
>
>
>
> The default security group is not syned, as I feel region specific default
> secgroup has to there in each region.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> We must use neutron to perform all our operations as with neutron we have
> total control over it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> For creating a security group we need the following information
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>      --tenant-id TENANT_ID
>
>
>
>
>                        The owner tenant ID.
>
>
>
>
>  --description DESCRIPTION
>
>
>
>
>                        Description of security group rule.
>
>
>
>
>  --direction {ingress,egress}
>
>
>
>
>                        Direction of traffic: ingress/egress.
>
>
>
>
>  --ethertype ETHERTYPE
>
>
>
>
>                        IPv4/IPv6
>
>
>
>
>  --protocol PROTOCOL   Protocol of packet. Allowed values are [icmp,
> icmpv6,
>
>
>
>
>                        tcp, udp] and integer representations [0-255]
>
>
>
>
>  --port-range-min PORT_RANGE_MIN
>
>
>
>
>                        Starting port range. For ICMP it is type.
>
>
>
>
>  --port-range-max PORT_RANGE_MAX      Ending port range. For ICMP it is
> code.
>
>
>
>
>  --remote-ip-prefix REMOTE_IP_PREFIX
>
>
>
>
>                        CIDR to match on.
>
>
>
>
> We have all these details with us available.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Let us take this forward, Please review/comment.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
>
> Ashish Singh
>
>
>
> =====-----=====-----=====
>
>
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
>
>
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
>
>
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
>
>
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
>
>
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
>
>
> information contained in this e-mail message
>
>
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
>
>
> you have received this communication in error,
>
>
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
>
>
> immediately and permanently delete the message
>
>
> and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
>
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
>
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to