Dear all I reviewed the meeting log[1] and it seems we have several questions to clarify. Feel free to comment.
1. how to integrate option 1: as a server like original proposal[2] option 2: as a module Both are OK to me, if it is YardStick's team to decide to integrate as a module, we need to revise the proposal and QTIP will provide full support on it as well. 2. testing vs benchmarking For sure benchmarking requires testing data. Benchmarking is one method/purpose of performance testing. Besides that, we may also use testing data for verification or validation. You may also use benchmarking result for verification or validation. 3. benchmarking in YardStick or testing in QTIP This is not a battle between two projects. We chase different targets and have common methodology. QTIP may consume testing data from YardStick but not all of them and not only from YardStick. YardStick may use QTIP as benchmarking module or implement its own module. It's up to YardStick team's decision and I'm fine with either way. [1]: http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-yardstick/2017/opnfv-yardstick.2017-01-24-00.30.log.html [2]: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/yardstick/Yardstick-Qtip+integration
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
