Hi Gerald and Aric,

Actually, this is miss-configuration of merge jobs. So, other merge jobs could 
have the same issue. We need to use 'git-scm' for merge jobs instead of 
'git-scm-gerrit' which is for verify jobs.


Best,
Ryota

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kunzmann, Gerald via RT [mailto:opnfv-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 5:14 PM
> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Mibu Ryota(壬生 亮太) 
> <r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com>
> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] 
> [linuxfoundation.org #35878] [releng][opnfvdocs] Problem with
> Git/Gerrit/Jenkins
> 
> Hi Aric,
> 
> Thanks for your investigations! I'll do the fix as you have proposed.
> 
> If I understand your reply correctly, this issue is limited to opnfvdocs?
> 
> Best regards,
> Gerald
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aric Gardner via RT [mailto:opnfv-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 26. Januar 2017 20:54
> To: Kunzmann, Gerald <kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>
> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com
> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] 
> [linuxfoundation.org #35878] [releng][opnfvdocs] Problem with
> Git/Gerrit/Jenkins
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Looks like the merge job is doing the wrong thing.
> 
> its checking out the patchset, rather than what is in master.
> since the patchset is from Dec 28, and does not touch 
> ./docs/requirements/05-implementation.rst (which has been updated
> since then) git does not see a conflict with merging this code.
> 
> If you look at the console output for the merge job 
> https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/opnfv-docs-merge-master/1232/console
> its doing this. > git fetch --tags --progress 
> ssh://gerrit.opnfv.org:29418/$GERRIT_PROJECT refs/changes/65/24365/4 #
> timeout=15
> and it should be just doing a straight clone of whats in master (after
> 24365 is merged)
> 
> For now you can just submit a small change to doctor/docs/whatever and then 
> merge it, this will get the latest version
> of all rst files into artifacts.
> 
> I will submit at change to jjb/opnfvdocs/opnfvdocs.yml to fix this confusing 
> behavior in the future.
> 
> Regards,
> Aric
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Kunzmann, Gerald via RT 
> <opnfv-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Sorry for another email on this issue:
> >
> > Today the situation is even more strange:
> >
> > There is the old alarm table in generated artifacts file:
> > http://artifacts.opnfv.org/doctor/docs/requirements/index.html
> > But the git tree still contains the new table:
> > https://git.opnfv.org/doctor/tree/docs/requirements/05-implementation.
> > rst
> >
> > What I realized is that in https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/24365/
> > after Ryota had merged the patch, jenkins-ci has just sent the document 
> > links, but there was no specific build started.
> Is this normal/okay?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Gerald
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kunzmann, Gerald
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 26. Januar 2017 13:40
> > To: 'opnfv-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org'
> > <opnfv-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org>; 'Fatih Degirmenci'
> > <fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com>
> > Cc: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org'
> > <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 'r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com'
> > <r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com>
> > Subject: RE: [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] [linuxfoundation.org #35878] Re:
> > [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng][helpdesk] Problem with
> > Git/Gerrit/Jenkins
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > So this issue is easily reproducible. It had again happened today with 
> > another patch being merged....
> >
> > https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/24365
> >
> > We are now back to the old table again :(
> >
> > We have to find a solution to this problem!!!
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Gerald
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kunzmann, Gerald
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2017 13:56
> > To: 'opnfv-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org'
> > <opnfv-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com
> > Subject: [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] [linuxfoundation.org #35878] Re:
> > [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng][helpdesk] Problem with
> > Git/Gerrit/Jenkins
> >
> > HI Fatih,
> >
> > Thanks for your quick check. The remerged had helped to bring back the 
> > table...
> >
> > Let's see docs team's reply on it.
> >
> > I agree gerrit was fine not raising conflict as the changed line in the 
> > "editorial" patch was not conflicting with the
> other patch.
> > Still, shouldn't gerrit have just changed that one line instead of also 
> > other parts of the file and/or shouldn't gerrit
> have raised some warning it was changing more than just the one line?
> >
> > When looking at the diff in gerrit for the "editorial" patch, it does not 
> > compare against the latest master, otherwise
> it would have shown more changes than just this one line. This might have 
> caused the issue?!?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Gerald
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com via RT
> > [mailto:opnfv-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2017 13:38
> > To: Kunzmann, Gerald <kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>
> > Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com
> > Subject: [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] [linuxfoundation.org #35878] Re:
> > [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng][helpdesk] Problem with
> > Git/Gerrit/Jenkins
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had a quick look at this and diffed the commits and I see no
> > conflict so Gerrit was fine not raising conflict. (the changed line in
> > 05-implementation.rst in most recent patch is not a conflicting
> > change)
> >
> > I then tried regenerating the documents by putting remerge as comment to 
> > check the doc generation script/job output
> for possible errors which I didn't see any. But the generated document is 
> correct now. If you don't see the updates, please
> try using a different browser or refresh the page after couple of minutes due 
> to caching.
> >
> > With that said, this doesn't really help us as we need to be able to trust 
> > our toolchain and we shouldn't need to remerge
> stuff just to make sure.
> > I'll raise this to docs team and see what they say.
> >
> > /Fatih
> >
> > From: <opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> on behalf of
> > "Kunzmann, Gerald" <kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>
> > Date: Wednesday, 25 January 2017 at 11:28
> > To: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org"
> > <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>,
> > "opnfv-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org"
> > <opnfv-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org>
> > Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng][helpdesk] Problem with
> > Git/Gerrit/Jenkins
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Not sure how is the best team to address this to. We have noticed the 
> > following issue:
> >
> > In Doctor project there had been two patches merged on the alarm comparison 
> > table in Section 5.5.3:
> >
> > -          https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/26715
> >
> > -          https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/27237
> >
> > Few days later, we merged another patch addressing some editorial changes 
> > in the document but NOT touching this alarm
> comparison table:
> >
> > -          https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/26731
> >
> > Unfortunately, this patch has overwritten the two patches merged earlier 
> > and the alarm comparison table is back to the
> old version.
> > I would have expected
> >
> > a)       that the patch is only changing the editorial fixes, and/or
> >
> > b)       result in a “merge conflict” as parts of the repo had been changed 
> > with the other patch.
> >
> > I had tried to revert the last patch 26731 in patch 
> > https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/27531/  , but the document links
> provided by jenkins-ci still show the old version of the table.
> > I would have expected that with the revert of the last patch, we would be 
> > back to the version we had after having submitted
> patch 27237.
> >
> > Now, whilst I could manually fix this issue by providing another patch to 
> > update the table, I am very concerned that
> this behavior may also cause similar issues in other patch submissions that 
> go unnoticed….
> >
> > Can someone please have a look at this?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Gerald
> >
> > ===============================================
> > Dr. Gerald Kunzmann, Manager
> > DOCOMO Communications Laboratories Europe GmbH Landsberger Strasse
> > 312, 80687 Munich
> > Tel: +49-89-56824-239 / Fax: +49-89-56824-300
> > Web: http://www.docomoeurolabs.de<http://www.docomoeurolabs.de/>
> >
> > Geschäftsführer: Atsushi Takeshita, Dr. Thomas Walter, Hisahiro
> > Hamahata, Hiroyuki Oto, Kei Tonokura, Amtsgericht München, HRB 132976
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
> 


_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to