Aaron,
OK, I added that topic in today’s agenda for Doctor meeting. Talk to you soon, Ryota From: Aaron Smith [mailto:aasm...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 12:06 AM To: Mibu Ryota(壬生 亮太) <r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Further discussion of NFVI / APP monitoring Hi Ryota, I think this is a good plan. We can start the discussion in the Doctor meeting and continue on the "Polling vs Event capture” if needed. Maybe also start the discussion on what might be the architecture for a monitoring / notification framework. Not necessarily including or not including any of the current component projects; more a discussion of the "ideal" solution to work towards.... Aaron On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:00 AM, Ryota Mibu <r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com<mailto:r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com>> wrote: Hi, Of course, I’m interested in such topic. The problem is I cannot join Barometer meeting as it would be 2 AM in my time zone… I hope someone can take notes. Doctor project is still candidate to have such discussion. And I’m open to add them to our meeting agenda. How about having “Polling vs Event capture” topic in tomorrow’s Doctor meeting first. If we need to dive into detail of monitoring, you can continue two hours later in Barometer meeting. BR, Ryota From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] On Behalf Of Carlos Goncalves Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 5:01 AM To: Aaron Smith <aasm...@redhat.com<mailto:aasm...@redhat.com>> Cc: Huangmeng (Sam) <huangm...@huawei.com<mailto:huangm...@huawei.com>>; Matvey Bossis (New Account) <matvey.bos...@huawei.com<mailto:matvey.bos...@huawei.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; Eliezer Dekel (A) <eliezer.de...@huawei.com<mailto:eliezer.de...@huawei.com>> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Further discussion of NFVI / APP monitoring Sounds good to me. Thanks Aaron and Maryam! Carlos On 26 Jan 2017, at 20:23, Aaron Smith <aasm...@redhat.com<mailto:aasm...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi, Maybe we could dedicate a portion of an upcoming Barometer meeting to discuss and put together talking points for a longer meeting? We have been encourage by the alignment that has been happening within the Barometer project. (VES and the telemetry / event definition work) Aaron On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Tahhan, Maryam <maryam.tah...@intel.com<mailto:maryam.tah...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi Folks On the barometer<https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fastpath> side, we’ve been looking and actively contributing to collectd to collect system statistics and to enable the monitoring of Events and metrics for the NFVI, with the goal of leveraging the features it has under the topics you mention. We’d be very interested in partaking in a discussion around the topics below to see how aligned we are, or if/how we can align. I think there’s a strong alignment with VES here also. One possibility is through the Weekly Technical Discussion forum, another would be to dedicate a few of the barometer weekly calls to this (which we would be happy to do, as an open call and without project focus). BR Maryam From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Smith Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 7:12 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Further discussion of NFVI / APP monitoring Hi, Would there be interest in a separate meeting to discussion what an "ideal" monitoring framework might look like. Topics might include: - Polling vs Event capture - Platform independent monitor agent - Network Interfaces - Kernel events - VM / Container monitoring - Common bus for Events / Telemetry / Config - Common Object model - Agent configuration - Performance - <<50ms This would be an informal brainstorming activity with more emphasis on concepts than existing projects (unless necessary). Thoughts? Aaron -- Aaron Smith | Senior Principal Software Engineer NFV Partner Engineering Red Hat aasm...@redhat.com<mailto:aasm...@redhat.com> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com<http://redhat.com> -- Aaron Smith | Senior Principal Software Engineer NFV Partner Engineering Red Hat aasm...@redhat.com<mailto:aasm...@redhat.com> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com<http://redhat.com> _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss -- Aaron Smith | Senior Principal Software Engineer NFV Partner Engineering Red Hat aasm...@redhat.com<mailto:aasm...@redhat.com> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com<http://redhat.com>
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
