Hi Uli. Yes, some of the x.731 definex states will be looked for. Also states from virtual environments that are not defined. In simple terms looking for what makes a virtual interconnect 'up' or 'down' and the end points.
Multi-site (and multi distro. Multi hosts and clusters) is indeed in the focus ;-) Best regards Koren Sent from my Samsung device -------- Original message -------- From: Ulrich Kleber <[email protected]> Date: 2/23/17 17:12 (GMT+02:00) To: "Koren Lev (korlev)" <[email protected]> Cc: "John Evans (joevans)" <[email protected]>, "Donald Hunter (donaldh)" <[email protected]>, "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: RE: Project proposals for adding analytics to OPNFV Hi, the time in the discussion call was over, so I like to put two questions about VINA here on the list. 1. When I read the proposal in the wiki, I got the impression VINA would focus very much on operational state. When you use that term, do you do it in the X.731 way, and which are the managed objects that will be covered? 2. You mentioned highly distributed clusters. Will you also interface with multisite then? Thanks, Uli From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Frank Brockners (fbrockne) Sent: Tuesday, 07 February, 2017 17:56 To: [email protected] Cc: Koren Lev (korlev); John Evans (joevans); Donald Hunter (donaldh) Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Project proposals for adding analytics to OPNFV Hi OPNFV, over the past few weeks we’ve distilled two proposals to add analytics and more diagnostic capabilities to OPNFV and OPNFV scenarios. We’ve published the two new project proposals on the wiki: • Bamboo: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/bamboo/Bamboo+Project+Proposal • VINA: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vina/VINA+Project+Proposal Bamboo is to introduce the analytics infrastructure provided by PNDA.io to OPNFV. VINA is to offer discovery and system health status for VIMs. Both projects are to work and in hand and are expected to integrate with both Barometer, VES, Qtip, etc. – as well as integrate with the testresults post-processing that we already do. We’re hoping for a discussion in the technical community meeting on Feb/23, and are also asking for an official TSC review post the technical community review. Target would be the TSC call on March/7. Your thoughts and ideas are greatly appreciated. Thanks much, Frank
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
