Hi Folks,
As I have been working on the test spec I have been explicit in how I have been referring to the CVP test objects and utilities. I have noticed that we seem to lack a common approach to how we refer to this program in the dovetail project. May I propose we establish some guidelines and apply them: We describe our activities as being in the context of the CVP (compliance and verification program) Our tools are to be described as “The CVP toolchain” The selected test cases and test areas should be referred to as the “CVP test suite” or “CVP tests” Dovetail is a project in OPNFV that does not carry test cases or deliver into the projects, it is more is the place we structure and document how the CVP is achieved by the OPNFV community. The toolchain being developed in dovetail is maybe not falling into that category, but that is more a short term bridging function until our test framework tools can bridge any needed gaps with regard to security protocols needed. I would propose specifically like to see that: We do not refer to the “dovetail project” in our CVP documents or tools this is not important for the consumer. We do not call our tools the “dovetail tools” nor refer to “dovetail tests” as these should be referred to as CVP tools, processes and tests. Cheers, Chris
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
