I missed one more topic about test case descriptions that need to be easily accessible to the testers and reviewers. The same topic showed up in today’s test WG call too BTW.
The revised agenda: Two action items in last week’s minutes, which we will cover. #action detail the steps for the user for the workflow #action the dovetail team to review the document patch Agenda for April 7: - Test strategy doc and task assignments – there is an outstanding action item for everyone to review the patch and consider contributions: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/32499/ - Plugfest activity planning: what should we get done o Who are going to be there o What tests we need to do – start testing the software toolchain, the full workflow and test guide docs o Equipment and installer/scenario combinations o Review new test areas that are ready - Test area review status and we need to reach agreement on process. Also take a look at the sdnvpn submission as an example to follow. - Test case description to help testers and reviewers understand/diagnose etc. – what is needed and what approach to add the descriptions o The refstack cases o Other feature cases - Tools discussion (this is a placeholder in case additional discussion is needed) - Jira plan still not in good shape – how do we get there before plugfest in 2 weeks. - Update on the action item: CVP workflow, discussion with LF/Jose et al on hosting, login and related jira task to dovetail. - Last minute comments on update to TSC/Board. Wenjing
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
