Hi Yuyang,

The video in youtube has voice? Is it correct?

Julien


Yuyang (Gabriel) <[email protected]>于2017年5月5日周五 下午3:07写道:

> Hi Alec,
>
>
>
> Please see my answers inline!
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Gabriel
>
>
>
> *From:* Alec Hothan (ahothan) [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 05, 2017 11:11 AM
> *To:* Yuyang (Gabriel); [email protected]; Cooper, Trevor;
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] On Stress Test Demo//RE: [test-wg]
> Notes from OPNFV Plugfest meeting - "Testing group Euphrates collaborative
> work"
>
>
>
> Hi Gabriel,
>
>
>
> Regarding TC1, do you have the results and original chart available
> somewhere (the chart in the picture and in the slides is kind of small).
>
> Gabriel: We do not have the original results and chart now since this is
> one time result that we have when we do local test. We have discussed the
> results plotting within Testperf.
>
> The test results will be shown in the community ELK maintained by bitergia
> in Q2.
>
> Some results could be found in the community CI, e.g.,
> https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/bottlenecks/job/bottlenecks-compass-posca_stress_traffic-baremetal-daily-danube/5/console
>
>
>
> Do you also have a detailed description of the test:
>
> Gabriel: I assume you ask detailed about TC3 here, since we only run TC1
> on vPOD or bare mental POD.
>
> ·         what kind of packet gen you are running in the first VM and
> what kind of forwarder you are running in the second VM
>
> Gabriel: For TC3, we use netperf to send packet and retransmit it in the
> second VM.
>
> ·         what flavor
>
> Gabriel: Bottlenecks calls yardstick to do each test, the flavor is
> specified in Yardstick, i.e., yardstick-flavor: nova flavor-create
> yardstick-flavor 100 512 3 1.
>
> ·         what vswitch was used
>
> Gabriel: OVS is used. If you have any recommendation, please also inform
> us :)
>
> ·         how are the VMs placed (wrt compute node, numa node)
>
> Gabriel: VMs are created by using heat client without specifying how and
> where to place them
>
> ·         I assume the test will ramp up the number of VM pairs, if so
> how do you synchronize your VM starts/measurements (VMs don’t tend to all
> start the test at the same time due to the latency for bringing up
> individual VMs)
>
>         Gabriel: Yes, the VMs will not start to ping simultaneously. We
> can only simultaneously sent the request to create all the VMs, waiting for
> the creation and then to the ping operation.
>
> ·         How do you track drop rate and latency across VM pairs
>
> Gabriel: I assume you mean the packet drop rate and latency here. For
> these metrics, we use netperf to do the monitoring
>
>
>
> Gabriel: you could also do the test locally. For more information, please
> refer to the link below.
>
> *Bottlenecks Testing Guide:*
> http://docs.opnfv.org/en/stable-danube/submodules/bottlenecks/docs/testing/developer/devguide/posca_guide.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>   Alec
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *<[email protected]> on behalf of "Yuyang
> (Gabriel)" <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 7:48 PM
> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Cooper,
> Trevor" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <
> [email protected]>, "[email protected]" <
> [email protected]>
> *Subject: *[opnfv-tech-discuss] On Stress Test Demo//RE: [test-wg] Notes
> from OPNFV Plugfest meeting - "Testing group Euphrates collaborative work"
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> For the stress test demo, we have added more details.
>
> Youtube link is provided below.
>
> https://youtu.be/TPd4NZr__HI
>
> Slides deck is uploaded in the WIKI page:
> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/bottlenecks/Sress+Testing+over+OPNFV+Platform
>
>
>
> The demo contents and results are briefly summarized below.
>
>
>
> &#8226  *Testing Contents*
>
> &#8226     *Executing Stress Test and Provide comparison results for
> different installers (Installer A and Installer B)*
>
> &#8226        Up to 100 stacks for Installer A (Completes the test)
>
> &#8226        Up to 40 stacks for Installer B (System fails to complete
> the test)
>
> &#8226     *Testing Steps*
>
> &#8226        Enter the Bottlenecks Repo: *cd /home/opnfv/bottlenecks*
>
> &#8226        Prepare virtual environment: *. pre_virt_env.sh*
>
> &#8226        Executing ping test case: *bottlenecks testcase run
> posca_factor_ping*
>
> &#8226        Clean the virtual environment: *. rm_virt_env.sh*
>
> &#8226  *Testing Results*
>
> &#8226     *Testing for Installer A*
>
> &#8226        Up to 100 stacks in configuration file for Installer B
>
> &#8226 1 stack SSH error when number of stack raised to 50
>
> &#8226        When stack number up to 100, most of the errors are heat
> response time out
>
> &#8226 100 stacks are established successfully in the end
>
> &#8226     *Testing for Installer B*
>
> &#8226        Up to 40 stacks in configuration file for Installer B
>
> &#8226 When stack number up to 30, the system fails to create all the
> stacks
>
> &#8226    21 stacks are either created failure or keeping in creation
>
> &#8226        To verify the system performance, we choose to do clean-up
> and run the test again
>
> &#8226 When stack number up to 20, same situation happens as in the last
> test
>
> &#8226 The system performance degrades
>
> &#8226 Different to the test for Installer A, we do the verification step
> because the system clearly malfunctions.
>
> &#8226        Which not shown in the demo is that after 3 rounds of the
> stress test, the system fail even to create 5 stacks
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Gabriel
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *[email protected]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 02, 2017 3:47 PM
> *To:* Cooper, Trevor; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [test-wg] [opnfv-tech-discuss] Notes from OPNFV Plugfest
> meeting - "Testing group Euphrates collaborative work"
>
>
>
> Thnaks Trevor
>
> I added some points that reflect the notes for the next test weekly
> meeting planned on the 4th of May:
> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TestPerf
> feel free to add additional points
> I will not be able to join this time, could you chair the meeting?
>
> /Morgan
>
>
> Le 28/04/2017 à 16:36, Cooper, Trevor a écrit :
>
> Status of Danube and what improved
>
>
>
>             1. landing page
>
>                         -
> http://testresults.opnfv.org/reporting2/reporting/index.html
>
>                         -
> http://testresults.opnfv.org/reporting2/reporting/index.html#!/landingpage/table
>
>                                     § Meaning of info displayed? Test ran,
> test passed … agree for consistency … TBD
>
>
>
>             2. catalogue - diagram with roll-over
>
>                         -
> http://testresults.opnfv.org/reporting2/reporting/index.html#!/select/visual
>
>                         - All PTLs to review if test cases are valid and
> if not remove
>
>                         - Add short description that is human readable
> (add API field)
>
>                         ○ Define test domain categories - start by using
> labels on test ecosystem diagram
>
>
>
>             3. Stress tests - video of presentation is available -
> simultaneous vPING which increases until system fails
>
>
>
>             4. Documentation
>
>                         ○ Ecosystem diagram
>
>                         ○ Testing guide
>
>                         ○ Add agenda item to TWG in June (2 sessions on
> how to improve)
>
>                         ○ New test projects … add to common docs
>
>                         ○ Developer guide - move to docs
>
>
>
>             5. Reporting status / dashboard
>
>                         ○ Bottlenecks TBD?
>
>
>
>             6. Bitergia
>
>                         ○ Morgan meeting 10th May
>
>                         ○
> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/testing/Result+alignment+for+ELK+post-processing
>
>                         ○ Add to TWG agenda next week to revisit
>
>
>
> Wish list for Infra group
>
>
>
>             - One POD dedicated to long duration tests (with reservation
> mechanism)
>
>
>
>             - Per installer
>
>                         ○ Stable of previous release
>
>                         ○ Master
>
>
>
>             - OPNFV POD on demand for tester (before merging)
>
>                         ○ Per installer if possible
>
>                         ○ Infra group working on it
>
>                         ○ Today can fill a ticket to ask if there is a
> free resource
>
>
>
> Micro services
>
>             - Deploy VNF
>
>                         ○ Retrieve image
>
>                         ○ Deploy
>
>                         ○ Prebuild image with tools - standardise on a
> framework
>
>                         ○ Take image and copy over tools - Ansible (infra
> doing this with Open Stack Ansible)
>
>                         ○ Catalog of roles for Ansible?
>
>                                     § Ansible Galaxy is a tool for
> deploying and managing roles
>
>                                                 □ e.g. Install TREX TG
>
>                                                 □ Turn on live migration
> in Nova
>
>
>
>             - Test generator?
>
>
>
>             - Collect / display results
>
>                         ○ Test API and DB
>
>                         ○ Reuse collectd lib for VNF KPIs
>
>
>
>             - Analytics of results
>
>
>
>             - What APIs to expose to other test projects?
>
>                         ○ Functest
>
>                                     § Deploy orchestrator VNF
>
>                                     § Use Traffic gen and generate load
>
>
>
>
>
> /Trevor
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Morgan Richomme
>
> Orange/ IMT/ OLN/ CNC/ NCA/ SINA
>
>
>
> Network architect for innovative services
>
> Future of the Network community member
>
> Open source Orange community manager
>
>
>
>
>
> tel. +33 (0) 296 072 106
>
> mob. +33 (0) 637 753 326
>
> [email protected]
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu 
> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
> falsifie. Merci.
>
>
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
> information that may be protected by law;
>
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
> this message and its attachments.
>
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
> modified, changed or falsified.
>
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to