Hi Georg Great suggestion and thanks for having this discussion during Openstack Boston. Since we are kind of in a jam for our weekly calls, do you think it's better to have 2 half an hour sessions and sooner, rather than waiting for when we can dedicate whole hour to it?
I'm also in touch with the ETSI TST side and would agree that it will benefit us to having them in on a separate meeting. Speaking of the jam we are in, I'd like to call volunteers who can take on some of the specific topics and push forward on those in parallel, and report status only on the weekly calls. Let's cover this in the call to see how everyone feels about this. Thanks. Wenjing -----Original Message----- From: Dave Neary [mailto:dne...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 4:15 PM To: Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com>; Georg Kunz <georg.k...@ericsson.com>; Wenjing Chu <wenjing....@huawei.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>; z...@redhat.com; Fu Qiao <fuq...@chinamobile.com>; Leo Wang <grakiss...@hotmail.com>; 'Lincoln Lavoie' <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; Jose Lausuch <jose.laus...@ericsson.com> Subject: Re: [dovetail] proposal: information sharing with OpenStack RefStack and Interop people I am all in favour. It may also make sense to connect with the ETSI TST group - perhaps in a separate meeting - to get their point of view too. Thanks, Dave. On 05/18/2017 07:04 PM, Cooper, Trevor wrote: > +1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Georg Kunz [mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 2:38 PM > To: Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com>; Cooper, Trevor > <trevor.coo...@intel.com>; Wenjing Chu <wenjing....@huawei.com>; > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > Cc: Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>; z...@redhat.com; Fu > Qiao <fuq...@chinamobile.com>; Leo Wang <grakiss...@hotmail.com>; > 'Lincoln Lavoie' <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; Jose Lausuch > <jose.laus...@ericsson.com> > Subject: [dovetail] proposal: information sharing with OpenStack > RefStack and Interop people > > Hi all, > > We are trying very hard to establish processes, guidelines and best practices > for running the OPNFV certification program - on our own and with guidance > from C&C. I believe we can much better leverage existing knowledge and > experience from related communities. In this context, I'd like to make a > proposal. > > As mentioned during last week's call, Jose and I had very insightful > conversations with the relevant folks from the OpenStack certification > domain: Catherine Diep (RefStack PTL), Egle Sigler (co-chair Interop working > group) and Mark Voelker (co-chair Interop working group). We have developed a > good relationship with them and they are willing and interested in sharing > their experience in running the OpenStack certification / interop program > with us. > > My proposal: I'd like to invite the aforementioned persons to one or two of > our project meetings and let them share their experience, best practices and > guidelines with us. Based on these insights, we can then define, adapt and > optimize our own processes to suite our needs. The latter is important - I > don't think we can simply adopt their existing processes, but we should learn > about why existing processes in the OpenStack domain have evolved to their > current form. The OpenStack certification program was started in 2013 and > officially launched in 2015 - so there was serious effort and time involved. > We should try to build upon existing knowledge without having to go through > the same learning phase as the OpenStack folks. > > This requires some thoughtful timing, of course: In the very short term > future, we need to focus on finalizing the first iteration of the OPNFV > certification program. My proposal is not intending to undermine this. On the > contrary. However, the earlier we get additional insight, the better we can > define our own processes. > > I don't want to put this on the agenda for tomorrow's meeting (for obvious > reasons), but instead discuss this by email. > > @Wenjing / Hongbo: can we dedicate a future meeting to such a sharing session > with the OpenStack folks? > > Best regards > Georg > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dave Neary [mailto:dne...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 9:54 PM >> To: Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com>; Wenjing Chu >> <wenjing....@huawei.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org >> Cc: Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>; z...@redhat.com; Fu >> Qiao <fuq...@chinamobile.com>; Leo Wang <grakiss...@hotmail.com>; >> 'Lincoln Lavoie' <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; Georg Kunz >> <georg.k...@ericsson.com> >> Subject: Re: [dovetail] Weekly meeting agenda for May 19 >> >> Hi, >> >> My suspicion is that the entire meeting will be taken up with agenda >> items 2 and 3 from Wenjing. >> >> We need alignment around the test areas, and test case review. We >> also need to clarify what, if anything, we need to get in terms of >> guidance from C&C. I suggest inverting these agenda items, because >> the second will take less time than the first. >> >> Thanks, >> Dave. >> On 05/18/2017 02:38 PM, Cooper, Trevor wrote: >>> I would like to propose some topics ... a few minutes for each >>> should be fine to decide if we can defer or need a decision >>> >>> >>> >>> - H/w resources for Dovetail >>> >>> - Dovetail artifact versions and release schemes >>> >>> - Test catalog domains relevant to compliance >>> >>> - Stability test criteria >>> >>> >>> >>> /Trevor >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing....@huawei.com] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 17, 2017 4:14 PM >>> *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org >>> *Cc:* Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com>; Tianhongbo >>> <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>; Cooper, Trevor >>> <trevor.coo...@intel.com>; z...@redhat.com; Fu Qiao >>> <fuq...@chinamobile.com>; Leo Wang <grakiss...@hotmail.com>; >> 'Lincoln >>> Lavoie' <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; Georg Kunz <georg.k...@ericsson.com> >>> *Subject:* [dovetail] Weekly meeting agenda for May 19 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Please comment if the following agenda makes sense: >>> >>> >>> >>> 1. Welcome new committers and where we need immediate new >>> contribution and attention >>> >>> 2. Preparation for tsc review on 5/30 >>> >>> 3. Ask - what we need to ask from c&c and board? How should we >>> take on the administrative side of tasks. Also the Danube addendum >>> for >> 5/22. >>> >>> 4. Naming convention of test cases >>> >>> 5. Vendor lab testing - needs volunteers to sign up beta testers >>> >>> 6. Tagging / releases, offline support >>> >>> 7. Design summit topics >>> >>> 8. Next week: can we still meet at the same time on 5/26 close to >>> memorial day weekend in US? >>> >>> >>> >>> We won't have enough time to cover all the topics in the meeting to >>> the full extent, but I'm hoping that we will have volunteers who can >>> take on some of the tasks and make progress. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Wenjing >>> >> >> -- >> Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, >> Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com >> Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
