Hi Yolanda, RST files (docs) should have a licence, see 'Documentation' on https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Contribution+Guidelines#ContributionGuidelines-GeneralCodeheaders
I think the question is more if a README.rst should have a license header. I agree with you and think not, as they are often rendered on github / pypi etc. Cheers, Luke On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Yolanda Robla Mota <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, good morning > In the recent checks from the Anteater project, i've seen an alert coming, > asking about a missing license header on a README file. > See: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/35731/ , Jenkins Ericsson > feedback on patchset 3. > > Any of our rst files have a license header there, and i'd say it's > uncommon to add license headers to rst files. > What do people think about it? Shall we add this check to rst files, or > limit those to source code files (python, ruby, java, bash, etc...) > > Thanks in advance for the feedback! > > -- > > Yolanda Robla Mota > > Principal Software Engineer, RHCE > > Red Hat > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > C/Avellana 213 > > Urb Portugal > > [email protected] M: +34605641639 > <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> > <https://red.ht/sig> > -- Luke Hinds | NFV Partner Engineering | Office of Technology | Red Hat e: [email protected] | irc: lhinds @freenode | m: +44 77 45 63 98 84 | t: +44 12 52 36 2483
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
