To Jiankun: Thanks for your great help. That is a big step for OpenRetriever.
For the POD, what do you mean we do not have the pod to test it currently ? Does it mean there is no POD available for us ? or there is no POD satisfy our requirement ? For E release, I submit our resource requirement in this page. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Project+CI+Resource+Requirements+for+Eu phrates Hi, Dave, Do you know how can openretriever team get the resource ? What need we do ? Thanks Xuan Jia Project Manager Big Data & IT Technology Research Center China Mobile Research Institute 32 Xuanwumen West Street, Xicheng Distirct, Beijing 100032, China Mobile: (+86) 13811000575 E-mail: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 chenjiankun 发送时间: 2017年7月18日 14:15 收件人: [email protected]; [email protected]; Ross Brattain <ross. [email protected]>; Gaoliang (kubi) <[email protected]> 抄送: [email protected]; [email protected] 主题: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OpenRetriever][Yardstick] Yardstick first kubernetes test case Hi All, After this patch(https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/36537/) merged, we are very glad to have the first test case in yardstick for kubernetes: ping_k8s. With the help of @Ruijing(thanks Ruijing:) as well as OpenRetriever team), now we have a basic kubernetes context, we have the basic ability to use kubernetes context to orchestrate containers(as SUT) and then do test on it. It should be our first step, I will strengthen kubernetes context step by step in the future. But we also have a problem: Ideally this test case should run in CI so that we can do continuous testing, but unfortunately we do not have the pod to test it currently. Also we need a way to trigger test case and then report the test result to our database. What’s your opinion? please do not hesitate to comment. Best Regards, Jack Chan
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
