Sounds like a good approach Lincoln. It would be nice to see how something like that fits into our current activities. Sorry I couldn’t be on the call to discuss it today, finding myself a little over scheduled at the moment.
/ Chris From: Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu> Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 16:01 To: Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com> Cc: Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11 Hi Chris, What I've seen other programs do for trials/launch is the following: 1. Freeze the development of new work 2. A group of companies or users would volunteer to be beta trial testers, submitting feedback / bugs 3. Only bug fixes from those beta "customers" are reviewed and accepted. 4. We need to decide the beta outcome requirements (i.e. all customers are passing, all tests run, etc). 5. Once that outcome mark is hit, that version would be considered the version submitted for approval. Cheers, Lincoln On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>> wrote: Hi Hongbo, Thanks, I’ve seen the information on the wiki. I guess the questions I have relates more to: Once we have the tool in a ready state, do we have a plan to validate it against volunteer commercial systems prior to having the TSC vote and making it generally available? I didn’t see that information on the wiki page, maybe I missed it? / Chris From: Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>> Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 11:05 To: Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Subject: RE: [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11 Hi Chris: Here is the page for recoding the history of this. We can discuss further. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Running+history+for+the+dovetail+tool Best regards hongbo From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] On Behalf Of Christopher Price Sent: 2017年8月11日 16:55 To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11 Hi Guys, Do we have a time-plan for the remaining work? I see we still have a lot of documentation work to do and the test cases are in flux, but we have other things to do as well. - Do we intend to test/validate the documentation in any way with community scenario’s prior to merging it? o Do we have people, resources and time-plans for that? - Will we arrange to test the toolchain against volunteer commercial systems in labs prior to making it available for use? o Same as above; people, resources, time-plans? I can also see the links are all pointing to “artifact.opnfv.org<http://artifact.opnfv.org>” which is not I assume where we intend to publish the documentation. Would be good to see how these items line up during the status review and remaining milestones discussion. / Chris From: <opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Trevor Cooper <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>> Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 09:29 To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11 Thanks Wenjing. I have updated the docs tracking page, lets review this for accuracy and highlight where reviews are most needed https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review … /Trevor From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 9:14 AM To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11 Hi Dovetailers, Proposed agenda for this week’s call on Friday: 1) Current tool+test status: (10 min) a. dovetail version 0.5 b. Testing pod resources 2) Docs, including the test case requirement patch https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/38763/1 -(10 min) 3) Overall status review and plan for the remaining milestones. (40 min) As the project is getting into shape, it’s good time for us to map out the remaining milestones and time table. As always, let us know if you have comments/suggestions. Regards Wenjing _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss -- ******************************************************************************* Lincoln Lavoie Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies [http://homeautomation.lavoieholdings.com/_/rsrc/1390068882701/unh-iol-logo.png]<https://www.iol.unh.edu> www.iol.unh.edu<https://www.iol.unh.edu> 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 Mobile: +1-603-674-2755 lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu> [http://homeautomation.lavoieholdings.com/_/rsrc/1390068882701/facebook.png]<http://www.facebook.com/UNHIOL> [http://homeautomation.lavoieholdings.com/_/rsrc/1390068882701/twitter.png] <https://twitter.com/#!/UNH_IOL> [http://homeautomation.lavoieholdings.com/_/rsrc/1390068882701/linkedin.png] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/unh-interoperability-lab> Ars sine scientia nihil est! -- Art without science is nothing. Scientia sine ars est vacua! -- Science without art is empty. *******************************************************************************
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
