+1 and thanks for the proposal, Alex!

Al

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Frank 
Brockners (fbrockne)
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 4:44 AM
To: Alec Hothan (ahothan); [email protected]
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed

+1 – per what Alec mentioned below, the new tagging scheme is only a small 
change incremental change from the earlier plans, but offers a lot of 
flexibility moving forward.
Frank

From: Alec Hothan (ahothan)
Sent: Montag, 25. September 2017 21:34
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: David McBride 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Fatih 
Degirmenci 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Frank 
Brockners (fbrockne) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Tallgren, 
Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed


I would like to get a quick vote from any person that works directly or 
indirectly with code in OPNFV

Please reply with -1, 0 +1

For using prefixed git tags for the Euphrates release: “opnfv-5.0.0”

This is a slight change to the plan on record (which was to use “5.0.0”). This 
does NOT impact euphrates deliverables for participating OPNFV projects (git 
tags on stable/euphrates are applied by releng).
The only externally visible effect is the naming of container tags for 
Euphrates official images in DockerHub will be named accordingly (e.g. 
“opnfv/functest:opnfv-5.0.0”).
Everything else remains the same.

If you’d like to know more, the rationale is described here: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/releng/OPNFV+projects+and+OPNFV+release+versioning<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_releng_OPNFV-2Bprojects-2Band-2BOPNFV-2Brelease-2Bversioning&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=BnFOET7vVz-l5p-4mFgkGMGDJq3nJ0-m_uI0LdNLdQY&s=KH73GpdZq3OZ_SwuUHsjspzPst6HyDEYqE5lm4amMts&e=>
 (thanks for Fatih, David, Frank, Tapio for reviewing)
In a nutshell, this adjustment is needed to prepare the path for proper 
continuous delivery support by projects.
Any clarification/questions/discussion can be done over email or at the TSC or 
release meetings tomorrow.

Thank You.

  Alec


_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to