Georg, You could meet your backward compatibility requirements by adding a Keystone v2/v3 proxy.It will be the best (and not so difficult) approach if Dovetail selects Fraser containers. Or Dovetail may pick the right OPNFV releases according to SUT. Cédric On jeu., 2018-09-06 at 12:56 +0000, Georg Kunz wrote: > Hi all, > > Thank you all for your quick feedback. I have added the mailing list, > which I forgot on my previous email. > > > In the context of a compliance program, we need to strive for a good > balance between > > > i) > keeping the bar up in terms of requirements on new features and > > > ii) > backwards compatibility to older versions of OpenStack which are > typically part of commercial systems. > > > In order to get some guidance in this regard, we can take a look at > the OpenStack Powered programs for example. Every guideline (release > spec) is supposed to be backwards compatible with 4 releases of > OpenStack. So, the 2017.09 guideline > [1], which matches Fraser, covers OpenStack releases back to Mitaka > [2]. During Mikata, identity v2 was still a valid API choice, to my > understanding. > > The exact number of backwards compatible releases in OVP is > debatable, but I believe the need for backwards compatibility is > apparent. > > As a consequence, this naturally imposes additional burden on the > test projects – not even talking about CI resources (which is already > now a > huge problem for Dovetail) and gating against older releases. It is > not my or Dovetail’s position to impose such requirements on test > projects – which already lift the bulk load of work anyway. So, I > wanted to come to a community agreement and – if needed > – a TSC discussion and decision on this. > > Further feedback and input is welcome. > > [1] > https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/interop/tree/2017.09.json > [2] > https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/interop/tree/2017.09.json#n10 > > Best regards > Georg > > > > From: Yuyang (Gabriel) <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2018 2:25 PM > > To: [email protected]; Limingjiang (Rex) < > [email protected]>; Georg Kunz <[email protected]> > > Cc: xudan (N) <[email protected]>; Raineri, Eddy < > [email protected]>; Lincoln Lavoie <[email protected]>; > Rautakumpu, Mika (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; SerenaFeng(zte) < > [email protected]>; > trevor.cooper <[email protected]>; Dimitrios Tsiolakis < > [email protected]>; Katsaounis Molyvas Stamatios < > [email protected]>; RICHOMME Morgan IMT/OLN < > [email protected]> > > Subject: RE: Identity v2 in OVP 2018.08 > > > > Hi Georg, > > The stress_ping test in Bottlenecks call yardstick to executing > tests. For the Bottlenecks part, both v2 and v3 are supported. > I am not sure about Yardstick. The stress-ping test has been run on > any v2 openstack quite a while. > I will try to find a v2 openstack and do some test to find out. > > Best, > Gabriel > > > > From: > [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 7:42 PM > > To: Limingjiang (Rex) <[email protected]>; Georg Kunz < > [email protected]> > > Cc: xudan (N) <[email protected]>; Raineri, Eddy < > [email protected]>; Lincoln Lavoie <[email protected]>; > Rautakumpu, > Mika (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; SerenaFeng(zte) < > [email protected]>; trevor.cooper < > [email protected]>; Dimitrios > Tsiolakis <[email protected]>; Katsaounis Molyvas Stamatios > <[email protected]>; Yuyang (Gabriel) < > [email protected]>; > RICHOMME Morgan IMT/OLN <[email protected]> > > Subject: RE: Identity v2 in OVP 2018.08 > > > > Hello, > > The support has been fully removed in Queens (Gambia) and was highly > deprecated in Pike (since many releases). > > A compliance program should be also conformed with OpenStack. > But it’s true that there is already a strong exception in Dovetail > refuted by OpenStack from a while about nova micro-api versions. > > I’m afraid that you may select opnfv/functest:danube in case of > Keystone v2. > > Cédric > > > > De : Limingjiang (Rex) > [mailto:[email protected]] > > Envoyé : jeudi 6 septembre 2018 13:19 > > À : Georg Kunz > > Cc : xudan (N); Raineri, Eddy; Lincoln Lavoie; Rautakumpu, Mika > (Nokia - FI/Espoo); > [email protected]; SerenaFeng(zte); trevor.cooper; Dimitrios > Tsiolakis; Katsaounis Molyvas Stamatios; OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN; > Yuyang (Gabriel) > > Objet : RE: Identity v2 in OVP 2018.08 > > > > Hi Georg, > > I think it works for Openstack Pike. But I suppose it will be > deprecated anyway in the later release of Openstack. [1] > > [1] > https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/keystone/pike.html#deprecation-notes > > > Best Regards, > Rex Lee > > +------------------------------------------------------------------ > -------------------------+ > > + > Mingjiang Li (Rex) Mobile: +86 13761275017 > + Shanghai Institute, Huawei > + No. 2222, Xinjinqiao Road, Pudong, Shanghai, 201206, P.R.China > +------------------------------------------------------------------ > -------------------------+ > > > > > From: Georg Kunz [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 5:00 PM > > To: xudan (N) <[email protected]>; Raineri, Eddy < > [email protected]>; Lincoln Lavoie <[email protected]>; > Rautakumpu, > Mika (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; SerenaFeng(zte) < > [email protected]>; trevor.cooper < > [email protected]>; Dimitrios > Tsiolakis <[email protected]>; Katsaounis Molyvas Stamatios > <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; Yuyang (Gabriel) < > [email protected]>; Limingjiang (Rex) <[email protected] > > > > Subject: Identity v2 in OVP 2018.08 > > > > Hi Dovetailers, > > I’d like to come back with a question to the team. We decided some > time ago to remove the identity v2 test cases because Functest > currently does not support v2. However, I am not feeling very good > about this anymore. From a compliance program perspective, there > might be the requirement to still support v2, which is deprecated but > still a valid API on older versions of OpenStack. Moreover, as this > was part of OVP 2018.01, we probably need a deprecation > phase in OVP as well. Finally, I suspect we should get back to the > TSC in order to get approval for this – the original TSC approval > still included v2. > > @Rex: Does Yardstick support identity v2? I was able to run an HA > test on Apex with v2. > > @Gabriel: I believe Bottlenecks support v2. Is that true? I cannot > test Bottlenecks on my virtual deployment because Bottlenecks tends > to kill it. > 😉 > > So, I’d like to get your opinion and input on this. > > Thanks > Georg > _____________________________________________________________________ > ____________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous > avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les > messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, > deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or > privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender > and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have > been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21966): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21966 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/25237240/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
