Hi, all. So far, we only received 5 poll for the time of OPNFV 2.0 meeting. And for now UTC 23:00-24:00 Monday slot is the most favorite one. However I don’t see any one from Europe take that poll.
Please provide your choice in the poll asap. And I think for this week, we will use the UTC 23:00-24:00 slot for the meeting. I will update the invitation accordingly. And we can use the following zoom bridge. https://zoom.us/j/2362828999 发件人: fuq...@chinamobile.com <fuq...@chinamobile.com> 发送时间: 2020年2月5日 11:12 收件人: 'FIX, MICHAEL A' <mf4...@att.com>; jba...@linuxfoundation.org; 'STEINBRUECK, SCOTT A' <ss7...@att.com>; 'Cooper, Trevor' <trevor.coo...@intel.com>; 'MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)' <a...@research.att.com>; sunku.rangan...@intel.com; 'opnfv-tech-discuss' <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 'TSC OPNFV' <opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org>; 'Rabi, Abdel, Vodafone Group' <abdel.r...@vodafone.com> 主题: OPNFV 2.0 subcommittee -- updates after 04/02/2020 TSC call Hi, all. Thank you for the discussion on yesterday’s TSC call. A few follow-ups from yesterday. 1. Re-decide the sub-committee meeting time. This week’s sub-committee call is UTC 0:00-1:00, which is impossible for European people to join. I have just created a doodle poll, so please provide you available time in the poll before this Friday, Feb. 7th. And we will work out the new meeting time next Monday. I will resend the meeting invitation after that. https://doodle.com/poll/9usr77tud4vrw9g2 2. Update wiki page to capture progress and decision making. According to what Al and the other suggested, I update the wiki page and set up two separate pages, one for working progress, and the other for capture agreements. Please provide your suggestions and comments on the working progress pagehttps://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Working+Progress+Page, and only the sum-committee chair is capable of editing the agreement pagehttps://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Agreements+Capture+Page 3. Plan for next week’s call On yesterday’s TSC, I think we have difficulty reaching consensus on the working items, since we are not sharing the same mission and goal within TSC. Therefore I suggest we first discuss and finalize the mission and goal statement, and then revisit the working items. In the working progress page, I put the mission statement as NO.1 for discussion. I also put the original statement and the statement the sub-committee proposed yesterday. According to yesterday’s comments, I suggest we put some words or texts that you think should be necessary to capture in the mission statement down, before we have the discussion next week. I managed a table in the working progress page for people to provide comments and suggestions of words. Please feel free to edit that before the next sub-committee call. Thank you, all. And hope we have a nice and efficient discussion next week.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#23918): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/23918 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/71124270/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
