Ah. Now I see that it doesn't even matter, as PerSuite is not supported for OSGi or Karaf modes.
On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 9:36:14 AM UTC-7, David Karr wrote: > > I'm working in a largish project, with multiple subprojects, each of which > have PaxExam-based integration tests. > > Presently, all of the tests are using the PerClass reactor strategy. > > When I run the "integration-test" goal from the top-level, it runs all of > the integration tests in the entire project. This is something that I > eventually want to run from CI, but only if it can be done reliably. > > Presently, we're seeing issues where the Karaf container fails to shut > down properly, resulting in the next test failing with "address in use" > errors. I'm considering all possible mitigation strategies for this > problem. > > I noticed that another reactor strategy is "PerSuite". This is a very > long shot, but is there any chance the impact of using this is that all of > the integration tests in the entire project would use the same container? > I think this is unlikely, but I figured I might as well ask. I understand > that even if this works, there are potential tradeoffs from lack of > isolation of tests, but a test that fails because it can't start up Karaf > is worse than that. > -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
