> Should we change it like that? I believe we shouldn't haste. It was only the question. I tried to remove this dependency for myself and succeeded to use it without transaction manager, but faced some sort of regression: for some reason it stopped working with DBCP2 connection pool (pax-jdbc-pool-dbcp2). I planned to investigate it deeper when having more time.
-- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
