Hi Nick.

Sorry for the late reply...we just moved to a new place.

Yes, if you could provide a Pax-Exam test would be great. Or maybe you 
could enhance the existing integration-tests via pull-request (just for the 
container you need, I will port to the others).  

Am Freitag, 28. April 2017 19:39:12 UTC+2 schrieb Nick Baker:
>
> Marc, this bug bit us again, unfortunately with a large production 
> customer ><. Sorry I didn't have time to follow-up on this earlier this 
> year. Would a PAX-Exam based IT be sufficient?
>
> Thanks,
> -Nick 
>
> On Friday, February 24, 2017 at 3:36:39 AM UTC-5, Marc Schlegel wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nick
>>
>> Thanks for spotting this. Your solution sounds reasonable, but we need to 
>> check the implications.
>> Could you please file a Jira-issue [1] and provide an example how you 
>> configure two colliding resources, so we can add this case to our 
>> integration-tests
>>
>> regards
>> Marc
>>
>> [1] https://ops4j1.jira.com/projects/PAXWEB/issues
>>
>> Am Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2017 22:14:01 UTC+1 schrieb Nick Baker:
>>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> We're experiencing an issue with bundles supplying Resource mappings. It 
>>> appears that the internal path within the bundle is used as the servlet 
>>> name [1]. Unfortunately, our teams love standards and conventions so 
>>> they're using a "web" folder for all bundles supplying Resources. This was 
>>> discovered on 3.1.4 but I've verified that the situation still exists in 
>>> master.
>>>
>>> PAX-Web appropriately doesn't allow multiple servlets of the same name 
>>> so we're loosing some resources upon startup of Karaf. The short-term 
>>> solution for us was to ensure that each internal bundle path is unique. A 
>>> better solution would be to modify PAX to create a composite key of 
>>> bundle-id + path when creating the resource Servlet names. 
>>>
>>> [1] 
>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-web-extender-whiteboard/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/extender/whiteboard/internal/element/ResourceWebElement.java#L57-L57
>>>
>>> -Nick Baker
>>>
>>

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to