We may want to have a community call for this. Pax Exam would benefit from losing some fat, in terms of: dependencies, API width, complexity, legacy etc. I found adding new capabilities quite hard because things where expanded without evolving the API itself. So what do you think? How about having a hangout some time?
On 14. Aug 2017, 14:18 +0200, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>, wrote: > > Comparative examples normally helps for these kinds of proposals. > > If the benefit is minimal (at some level), then one should also question > whether a change from the past is worth it, even if it would make sense when > done from scratch in the first place. > > Cheers > Niclas > > > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 6:49 PM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In past times we used TestContainerFactory to create 0..n TestContainer, > > > currently we only return one. So the factory is degraded to a way to > > > instantiate a TestContainer with a given Exam system. > > > > > > I would propose to drop the TestContainerFactory at all and instead only > > > have TestContainer SPIs where we decalre that these must have atleast one > > > public vissible constructor with argument ExamSystem or Option[]. That > > > way it would be more clear how to implement and access TestContainer and > > > how they get their Options... > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > -- > > > -- > > > ------------------ > > > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] > > > > > > --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "OPS4J" group. > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > > email to [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java > -- > -- > ------------------ > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OPS4J" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
