Is there no @SuppressWarning to Mark the exceptions (pun intended)? On Aug 23, 2017 11:36, "Christian Schneider" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Currently the checkstyle rules forbid to catch Exception. > > I propose to change this as catching Exception is sometimes very useful > when for example a called method throws Exception or we simply want to map > to RuntimeException to avoid having throws Exception in every caller. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > Open Source Architect > http://www.talend.com > > -- > -- > ------------------ > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] > > --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "OPS4J" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
