+0.99 from me why not +1? I have only one little concern and I hope it's not that important.
With https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXWEB-1103 I added support for undertow.xml based configuration, which is based on these two XSDs: - urn:jboss:domain:4.2 - urn:jboss:domain:undertow:3.1 I used the schemas from wildfly 10.x which uses Undertow 1.3.x, because at the time I was implementing PAXWEB-1103, pax-web also was using TIPI versions of Undertow 1.3.x But then we've switched to Undertow 1.4 (official bundles, no more pax-tipi), which is related more to Wildfly 11.x, which uses: - urn:jboss:domain:5.0 - urn:jboss:domain:undertow:4.0 The changes are actually not that huge (a medium refactoring to truststore/keystore configuration), but I wanted to have the XSD versions bumped before 6.1.0.GA... However, because I didn't implement full "information content model" from the above XSDs, I can add support for wildfly 11.x *later*, after 6.1.0.GA. What do you think? I can even try to support both (pairs of) schemas. regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-12-20 0:22 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>: > [[ I sent this email on monday but to the old list and it took quite some > time to come back in error, so I'm sending it again now... ]] > > Hi everybody ! > > Last week, I pushed a new small project, pax-keycloak, to the osp4j > repository. > The aim is simply to provide a good integration between keycloak ( > http://www.keycloak.org) and pax-web / karaf. > Keycloak is an open source identity / access management server. Fwiw, > there's already an integration layer between keycloak and fuse, but it's > quite cumbersome to setup and use, so I basically rewrote it. At some > point, maybe it can be integrated back into keycloak to replace their > existing layer. > > This small project is now an optional dependency of pax-web, and provides > an easy integration of web application into keycloak. The setup is > basically to register a login config in the web.xml with an authentication > type of KEYCLOAK and to add a keycloak json config file in the web app. > > With the above integrated in both 6.1.x and master branches of pax-web, > I'd like to have a release of pax-web 6.1.x which brings better Java 9 > support (through xbean 4.6 / asm 6.0 upgrade). The goal would be to > integrate that into Karaf in order to release a 4.2.0.M2. > Any objection to releasing 6.1.0 this week ? > > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > -- > -- > ------------------ > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OPS4J" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
