+1 for the release

Regards
JB

Le 26 sept. 2018 à 03:46, à 03:46, Grzegorz Grzybek <[email protected]> a 
écrit:
>Hello
>
>https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXJDBC-133 is fixed now. I'd like to
>cut a
>release of pax-jdbc 1.3.1 this week - there are no more unresolved
>PAXJDBC
>issues. Anything more before I start the release?
>
>regards
>Grzegorz Grzybek
>
>śr., 26 wrz 2018 o 09:13 françois papon <[email protected]>
>napisał(a):
>
>> Thanks Grzegorz !
>>
>> *François Papon*
>>
>>
>> Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 11:02, Grzegorz Grzybek
><[email protected]> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> Thanks for reporting - I've created
>>> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXJDBC-133 issue and I'm working on
>it -
>>> I think I'll release 1.3.1 this week.
>>>
>>> best regards
>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>>
>>> wt., 25 wrz 2018 o 11:51 Matej Ferencak <[email protected]>
>>> napisał(a):
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We noticed a problem since PAX JDBC 1.3.0.
>>>> When using pax-jdbc-config bundle, there is a
>>>> ConcurrentModificationException thrown during its deactivation.
>>>> This for instance leads to failed feature deployments in case the
>bundle
>>>> has to be restarted.
>>>>
>>>> We are using Karaf 4.2.1, which recently switched to pax-jdbc
>1.3.0.
>>>> Earlier Karaf versions which included 1.2.1 did not have this
>problem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The actual issue was introduced with git
>>>> revision 02e93e6dd45057d026bf7cefd4ccbe724531fab4
>>>> Take a look
>>>> at
>pax-jdbc-config/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/jdbc/config/impl/DataSourceConfigManager.java
>>>>
>>>>     @Override
>>>>     public void deleted(String pid) {
>>>>         ServiceTracker<?, ?> tracker = trackers.remove(pid);
>>>>         if (tracker != null) {
>>>>             tracker.close();
>>>>         }
>>>>     }
>>>>
>>>>     synchronized void destroy() {
>>>>         for (String pid : trackers.keySet()) {
>>>>             deleted(pid);
>>>>         }
>>>>     }
>>>>
>>>> The newly introduced destroy() method has a loop which causes an
>>>> exception in case there are more than one data sources configured
>(which is
>>>> needed to replicate the issue).
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Matej.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> ------------------
>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> ------------------
>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups
>>> "OPS4J" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
>> --
>> ------------------
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups
>> "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>-- 
>-- 
>------------------
>OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>
>--- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "OPS4J" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to [email protected].
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to