Currently, I am observing some lag in putting the messages in one of the queues. Roughly, the number is about 1-4 messages per second. And, this is way too slow than my previous configuration.
I checked this from the activemq console. I will try to see if I can produce some performance metrics. But, the thing is that I observed the enqueue/dequeue rates to be extremely slow. Regards, Cooshal. On Monday, June 17, 2019 at 11:02:40 AM UTC+2, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > > Hello > > What kind of processing performance problems do you have? pax-jms doesn't > add any special processing - it only deals with exposing connection > factories to your beans/components/services/... > > PooledJMS itself MAY add some processing overhead, but it of course > depends on its configuration. After your application calls > javax.jms.ConnectionFactory.getConnection(), it's all up to > you/camel-jms/spring-jms how to use/cache/not-cache it... > > I'm interested in some numbers, logs maybe - how did you find out that the > performance is worse? > > thanks in advance for any help/feedback > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > pon., 17 cze 2019 o 10:57 Kushal Gautam <[email protected] <javascript:>> > napisał(a): > >> Hi: >> >> I am using Camel with Karaf, and ActiveMQ >> >> Before using pax-jms, I was providing connectionfactories as artifact. >> But, since it was not configurable, I planned to switch it to pax-jms. >> >> But, so far, after switching to pax-jms, I have noticed performance lag >> in message processing. I am not entirely sure, if this is due to pax-jms. >> >> Thus, in general, does pax-jms degrade the message processing performance >> at all? >> >> For example, my jms-config looks like: >> >> name = eai-producer >> jms.url = tcp://localhost:61616 >> jms.username = system >> jms.password = manager >> type = activemq >> pool = pooledjms >> osgi.jndi.service.name = jms/producer >> org.apache.karaf.features.configKey = org.ops4j.connectionfactory-producer >> >> Regards, >> Cooshal. >> >> -- >> -- >> ------------------ >> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] <javascript:> >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "OPS4J" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/dc425a85-23d9-4f47-a855-9d9d96a70689%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/dc425a85-23d9-4f47-a855-9d9d96a70689%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/3c8d060e-8f7b-4c47-aee3-1b955d217aef%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
