Hi, in another thread I've just seen a lot of discussion about aliases etc. If you think of refactoring Pax Web, please make sure you're able to verify Pax Web vs. the OSGi TCK. Cause the current basis has been checked to work with the OSGi specification at the time when working on it. Luckily we had someone who was able to get a hold of the TCK at the time. He did some verification. Therefore I highly recommend to be very cautious about changing to much of the underlying Http and Web services, all of them have been proven to be valid according to the OSGi spec (which at the time has been 4.3, I believe)
thanks, Achim -- Apache Member Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAD0r13dNhcrz65mpSiv_Zjd7P3p5f1VxvDJ9PJrwj44QWHP4iw%40mail.gmail.com.
