Hi Anoop, This is a best practices draft which lists various techniques and their tradeoffs; this helps operators choose the right technique based on deployment scenarios/applications.
There are also some aspects worth considering for standardization; IETF could potentially consider a standards-based activity around, say, a data-model used to move long-lived large flow information from the router to a central management entity. Thanks, ramki -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anoop Ghanwani Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:17 PM To: ramki Krishnan Cc: Scott Bradner; Chris Liljenstolpe; Melinda Shore; Sanjay Khanna; [email protected] Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] new IETF draft - large flow load-balancing Ramki, Is there anything that needs to be standardized in order for someone to implement this? It sounds like this is purely an implementation issue. Anoop On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:10 AM, ramki Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > > > A new IETF draft on large flow load-balancing has been posted. We have > very good feedback so far from Shane Amante; your comments would be > much appreciated. > > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load- > balancing/ > > > > Thanks, ram > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
