are these actually comments from Verizon (i.e. Verizon put together a task force to review the document, then developed and approved a set of comments at the corporate policy level) or are these comments from an individual that happens to work at Verizon?
note that the IETF does not recognize company opinions (everyone knows that Cisco does not think) we recognize the opinions of knowledgable individuals (there are a lot of people who work at Cisco who have been shown to be able to think rather well) any assertion that a comment expresses the opinion of a corporation will generally be discarded as uninformed so - please do not attribute something to a corporation that is actually only an individual opinion (unless, the corporation has undertaken a formal internal process to develop an opinion, in which case please explain that - the IETF does not quite know what to do with such an opinion but if a company goes through the effort we should know about it) Scott (with chair hat on) On Feb 26, 2013, at 9:48 PM, ramki Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Roman, > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnan-large-flow-load-balancing/ > > Thanks for taking the time to review the draft and thanks a lot for the > detailed comments. We will respond to your comments shortly and also update > the draft accordingly. > > Thanks, > Ram > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 6:46 PM > To: Ram Krishnan > Cc: ramki Krishnan > Subject: Fwd: more comments from Verizon on Mechanisms for Optimal LAG/ECMP . > drat > > FYI .. more comments from Verizon.. waiting for comments and real-time > support from China Telecom..and others Thanks. > Best. > Bhumip > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: r krzanowski <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:42 PM > Subject: Re: PLS review if possible.. > To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > > Hi Bhumip, > few comments added. > Regards > roman > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:49 PM, > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi Roman, > Thanks for the discussion . > If you can kindly review the IETF draft below and send comments ASAP. > Many thanks again. > Best. > Bhumip > > > ============================================= > > Mechanisms for Optimal LAG/ECMP Component Link Utilization in > Networks (draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing-04.txt) > > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing-04.txt > > Abstract > > Demands on networking infrastructure are growing exponentially; the > drivers are bandwidth hungry rich media applications, inter-data > center communications, etc. In this context, it is important to > optimally use the bandwidth in wired networks that extensively use > LAG/ECMP techniques for bandwidth scaling. This draft explores some > of the mechanisms useful for achieving this. > > > > > > <OPSAWG-LAGECMP-rmk.doc>_______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
