Hi John, Ok, thanks. Do Appreciate the reply.
Mike ----- Original Message ----- > I was the last one to "hold the pen" on this one, though I came to the party > pretty late (basically, taking over for Bill Fenner when he became an AD, > just to shepherd it thru the last stages of approval and publication). > > I remember there was an IPv6 MIB design team, that I believe set the > direction for the combined v4/v6 MIBS (4022, 4113,4292, 4293). > At the point I was working on it, the target was consistency with the TCP MIB > (RFC 4022). > > One point here is that ICMPv4 and ICMPv6 are separate protocols, whereas UDP > is the same protocol for v4 and v6, so the situation is more similar to the > TCP situation than it is to the ICMP one. > > FWIW, I know HP switches to report v4+v6 in the In/OutDatagrams counters. > > John > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
