On Mar 18, 2013, at 4:17 AM, Shishio Tsuchiya <[email protected]> wrote:

> CPE would do firewall to the user traffic for all of delegated prefix, Home 
> GW might do firewall to user traffic.
> If security policy is same then user traffic would be double count/check on 
> both HomeGW and CPE.
> It is waste of resource and might be downgraded for user experience.
> 
> It is enough to do by each of one.
> What do think?

You might want to look at the work Erik Kline and Lorenzo Colitti have been 
doing in homenet on homenet edge detection.

As for hierarchical prefix delegation, the current way of doing it is broken—if 
you divide the prefix arbitrarily and delegate larger prefixes than /64 within 
the home, you wind up with a mess, although it does make routing simple until 
it fails.   If you want to do prefix delegation within the home, the CPE edge 
router that got the delegation from the ISP should be the delegating router for 
the entire home, and the routers below it in the hierarchy should relay PD 
requests up to the CPE edge.


_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to