Hello authors,

Thanks for sharing your tests.
Some comments are below.

Section 5.2 provides two formulas to estimate the address multiplexing.
If the formula of static assigment is intended to align with
I-D.donley-behave-deterministic-cgn, it may be amended by adding
active subscriber's coefficient. CGN may only assign static port block
to active users.Meanwhile, log just needs to add one record for each
user.

Section 6.1 states the MCS is highly dependent with retention time of
NAT table. It would be intereted to add some discussions if CGN could
interact with PCP.

BTW, the table shown CGN sets retention time for DNS. would you do DNS
filter on CGN to identify DNS package?  I saw you also described DNS
bypass CGN. Are those related?

Many thanks

Gang

2013/4/2, kaname nishizuka <[email protected]>:
> Dear all,
>
> As I mentioned before, we are testing CGN under the support of Japanese
> Government.
> Now, we've uploaded a new draft based on the result of our verification.
> The useful information about the average consumption of the ports are
> available on the document.
> Please look through it and all kind of feedback are welcome.
> We mentioned Victor's draft "CGN Deployment with BGP/MPLS IP VPNs Draft" in
> introduction
> because part of our research shares the same motivations with it.
>
> The document is *NOT* intended to be Standards Track. It's for
> Informational.
> The wrong description is just mere mistake, so we'll soon correct it in the
> next revision.
>
> The full report of our work will be available soon on the Web.
> We've just finished writing.
>
> Best regards,
>
> kaname
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:      New Version Notification for
> draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations-00.txt
> Date:         Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:12:25 -0700
> From:         [email protected]
> To:   [email protected]
>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Kaname Nishizuka and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Filename:      draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations
> Revision:      00
> Title:                 Carrier-Grade-NAT (CGN) Deployment Considerations.
> Creation date:         2013-03-29
> Group:                 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 16
> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations-00.txt
> Status:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations
> Htmlized:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations-00
>
>
> Abstract:
>     This document provides deployment considerations for Carrier-Grade-
>     NAT (CGN) based on the verification result include the investigation
>     of the number of sessions of applications.  The verification was
>     conducted in StarBED which is one of the largest scale network
>     experiment environment in Japan.  A million of subscribers was
>     emulated and it revealed the realistic behavior of CGN.
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to