> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of joel jaeggli
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:50 PM
> To: Melinda Shore; David Harrington
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption, two capwap-related documents
>
> On 4/11/13 11:29 AM, Melinda Shore wrote:
> > On 4/11/2013 10:28 AM, David Harrington wrote:
> >> Which types of expert review? CAPWAP experts? 802.11n experts?
> >> Security experts? Network management experts? Operator experts?
> > Apologies for the lack of clarity. CAPWAP, 802.11n,and operators.
> capwap overlaps with the ieee and the previous document series had a
> review team with expertise on both sides. even if extensions might not
> require harmonization (I'm not saying they do or don't), review should
> be to insure the lack of messy accident.
[[DR]] Absolutely so. If these items are adopted as work items by the OPSAWG I
will suggest to add explicit text in the charter concerning coordination with
and reviews by IEEE 802.11
Regards,
Dan
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
