I agree -- I see no conflict with l2tpext work. -- Carlos.
On Aug 19, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Ignacio Goyret <i.goy...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > I don't see any conflict with l2tpext wg work. > -Ignacio > > At 07:43 8/19/2013, Ted Lemon wrote: >> I've taken on the conflict review for draft-pfaff-ovsdb-proto-02, which is >> proposed for publication in the independent stream. I think this document >> does not conflict with the work that you are doing, but I would appreciate >> it if you could take a quick look at the document and make sure that you >> agree with me. >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pfaff-ovsdb-proto-02 >> >> Thanks! >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
