Hi - > From: "Joe Marcus Clarke" <[email protected]> > To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 12:29 PM > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] VMM-MIB: Proposal: Joe -3 (Was Re: Comments on > draft-asai-vmm-mib-04) ... > Would it not be better to implement something like NETCONF for the > configuration side of things if I really wanted to offer configuration? > then this MIB could really be left for monitoring.
Punting the configuration problem to Netconf doesn't reduce the modeling (or operational) complexity presented by read-write objects like these. If you argue instead that they should be read-only, that's another matter (though still fraught with complexity, given the ways Netconf can work) but doing so also, for me at least, raises the "why bother" question regarding this MIB module. If these objects would merely reflect the current configuration data, then they'd add no value, and there'd be no point in having them at all. Randy _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
