Sorry, section 6 of which document? Section 2.3.1 of the SYSLOG document
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-behave-syslog-nat-logging-05.txt
is the most relevant to this discussion. What is termed a generalized
internal address in that section represents the prior point of view:
that the realm has to be qualified with further information to identify
the subscriber site uniquely. The fact is that the characterization in
that section is incomplete -- the qualifying information required can
also include VLAN and VRF identifiers.
I guess the proposed new text effectively incorporates the generalized
internal address information into the realm name, so the administrative
action required would be something that does that automatically.
Tom
On 21/12/2013 9:24 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
In the case of DS-Lite, however, this has an operational impact:
administrative action is required to assign a realm identifier to
every individual subscriber site served by a DS_Lite tunnel.
Reading section 6, the incoming realm identifier refers/includes the
IPv6 address of the encapsulating tunnel (from the customer device).
Why is an admin action required?
Cheers, Rajiv
Sent from my Phone
....
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
