Hi Ed, This would be perfect, and thanks for doing this, Ed. The cut-off date for submissions before IETF-89 is 2/14. Having an I-D before that date would allow to send it for comments to the OPSAWG mail list. It’s already in the charter, but the first version should be probably an individual submission draft-beili-opsawg-ethernet-mib-transition (or something similar) and we can ask at the OPSAWG meeting in London to adopt it as WG item. In case you cannot attend IETF-89 in London I can present on your behalf.
Regards, Dan From: Edward Beili [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: יום ג 14 ינואר 2014 19:34 To: Benoit Claise Cc: [email protected]; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Pat Thaler Subject: RE: Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011 Say the 1st draft by Feb 9th? Regards, -E. From: Benoit Claise [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 18:47 To: Edward Beili Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Pat Thaler Subject: Re: Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011 Ed, Benoit, I wouldn’t call it focusing, but since I committed I would have to do it. Thanks. Any time estimation? Regards, Benoit. Thanks for reminding me. Regards, -E. From: Benoit Claise [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 18:34 To: Edward Beili Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Pat Thaler Subject: Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011 Dear Ed, The OPSAWG charter says: (D) Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011. Considering RFC 4663 "Transferring MIB Work from IETF Bridge MIB WG to IEEE 802.1 WG" as an reference, the following pieces of information would the foundation for the document: a table mapping the old IETF MIB names with the corresponding new IEEE ones, clarifications/rules on the IETF-IEEE interactions (mailing lists, reviews), and clarifications on the intellectual property considerations. If I remember correctly, you committed to work on this one. With the approval of draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis-07<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis/>, are you now focusing on this new work item? Please let us know. Regards, Benoit
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
